Town Square

Post a New Topic

No appetite for rent control among council candidates

Original post made on Sep 27, 2014

While the pace of rent hikes in Mountain View has led to calls for rent control from some community leaders and middle class families, City Council candidates are favoring long-terms plans for meeting housing supply instead of the type of rent control ordinances in place in cities such as San Francisco, Oakland, Los Gatos, San Jose and East Palo Alto.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, September 26, 2014, 12:00 AM

Comments (2)

Posted by Informed Renter
a resident of Monta Loma
on Sep 27, 2014 at 6:55 pm

A Rent Stabilization Ordinance will improve the lives of many Mountain View residents, and due to state law (Costa Hawkins)will not cause any reduction in the willingness of developers to build new rental housing. Costa Hawkins requires that rent stabilization can only apply to rental units built prior to 1995. That means that new units will not be covered by rent control, but many older units could be. And if rent control is enacted, will older units fall into disrepair? Apartment owners are certainly making plenty of money to fund repairs at current rental rates. Rent stabilization only limits the rate of increase in rent, and only for ongoing tenants. When a new tenant moves in, market rate can be charged. So yes, rent stabilization doesn't lower the rent of a new tenant, but at least that tenant will have a chance of being able to remain in their apartment long enough for their children to complete elementary school without having to move their family. That matters. Rent stabilization gives renters some security that their insanely high rents won't double overnight.


Posted by Informed wage earner
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Sep 28, 2014 at 7:28 am

A Wage Stabilization Ordinance along with a Rent Stabilization Ordinance will improve the lives of many Mountain View residents, and will not cause any reduction in the willingness of workers to supply labor. Like Costa Hawkins requires that rent stabilization can only apply to rental units built prior to 1995, we would apply the wage ordinance to residents that live in these older units. That means that new units will not be covered by rent control or wage controls, but many older units could be. When a new tenant moves in, market rate can be charged for rent since the new renter is also earning market wages. So yes, rent and wage stabilization doesn't lower the rent or wages of an old tenant, but at least that tenant will have a chance of being able to remain in their apartment long enough for their children to complete elementary school without having to move their family. That matters. Rent and wage stabilization gives renters some security that their insanely high rents or wages won't double overnight.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Mountain View Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

Is California engaging in wishful thinking or rigorous planning?
By Sherry Listgarten | 12 comments | 5,871 views

New Austrian cuisine: Naschmarkt to replace Anatolian Kitchen in Palo Alto
By The Peninsula Foodist | 3 comments | 3,561 views

Please prioritize saving Palo Alto's emptying downtown
By Diana Diamond | 13 comments | 1,718 views

Holiday Hoopla in the City
By Laura Stec | 0 comments | 1,069 views

“Attached.” by Amir Levine, MD, and Rachel S.F. Heller, MA
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 1,023 views