Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

The Mountain View Whisman School District is taking the first steps toward changing attendance boundaries for its schools, as the city’s demographics change and a group of parents pushes to open a new school in the northeastern corner of Mountain View.

Changing school attendance boundaries can be contentious and controversial, and will be a “big challenge” for the district, according to Interim Superintendent Kevin Skelly. He said the changes will affect property values as well as the expectations of home-buyers, and it will be difficult for the district to please everyone.

“There’s a joke in superintendent circles that this is what superintendents do in the last year of the contract before they retire,” Skelly said. “There will be no way to make everyone happy with new boundaries.”

Growing enrollment at the newly-divided Castro Elementary School and possibly opening a new school in the Whisman and Slater neighborhood area are cited as the primary reasons for the review of attendance boundaries. Residents in the northeast quadrant of Mountain View complain that they haven’t had a neighborhood school since Slater Elementary closed in 2006. Current attendance boundaries have kids in the area split between Huff, Theuerkauf and Landels elementary schools.

On top of that, a 2014 demographic study shows projected student populations and newly-built residential housing could bump up enrollment beyond capacity at some schools. Huff Elementary, for example, has been at capacity for years, and accepted no students from its waiting list this year.

“Everybody agrees that the boundaries right now aren’t working particularly well,” Skelly said.

In order to get community input, the district created the Boundary Advisory Task Force, which aims to represent the community as a whole and make recommendations on how to adjust boundaries. The task force includes parents, principals, teachers, representatives from neighborhood associations and former City Council member Ronit Bryant representing the city of Mountain View. The task force is expected to come up with a recommendation by April, with new boundaries implemented in the 2016-17 school year.

Besides Bryant, task force members include Castro Principal Terri Lambert, Graham principal Kim Thompson and board members Greg Coladonato and Bill Lambert.

Skelly said the task force and its communication with the public needs to be as open and transparent as possible to ease any controversy over the results.

“Often times if people don’t like the result they criticize the process, so it has to be open with continual opportunities for feedback,” Skelly said.

New school a district priority?

The plans for re-drawn boundaries could mean the district will have to make a final decision on whether to open a school in the Whisman and Slater neighborhoods, which would have a big influence on the task force recommendations.

If a new school were opened, students in the area would no longer have to be redistributed to nearby elementary schools through a patchwork of attendance boundaries in the area where Highways 85, 101 and 237 meet.

Former Superintendent Craig Goldman and some board members have come out in favor of opening a new school in the district, saying it’s really more of a question of “when” to open the new school. But so far the board has not approved a plan to re-open either Whisman or Slater campuses, or construct an entirely new school. Whisman has been leased to the private German International School of Silicon Valley since 2000 and in 2006, the Slater campus was leased to Google for use as a daycare facility.

New attendance boundaries might not be the only thing hung up until the board makes a decision on a new school. The Boundary Advisory Task Force will be working concurrently with the new Construction Advisory Group, which will decide how to spend the remaining bond money from Measure G. Bond money is to be used to update and construct new facilities at the elementary schools. and could also be used to open a school in the Whisman and Slater neighborhood.

Bob Weaver, a resident of the Whisman and Slater area, said the board should formally announce they will open “some kind of walkable neighborhood school” right away. That way, he said, the Construction Advisory Group and the Boundary Advisory Task Force will be working with a “full deck” knowing whether a school will exist in the northeast region of the city.

Weaver argued that the new school would redistribute students in a way that will solve the overcrowding at Huff Elementary, and would be considered a win-win.

When the issue was brought up in April last year, Goldman said Landels and Theuerkauf Elementary, the schools near the Whisman and Slater area, are not overcrowded, and that a new school could siphon off too many students and cause problems, possibly forcing a school closure.

Board member Ellen Wheeler agreed at the time that the district should be cautious moving forward, but during the school board election said opening a school is “the right thing to do at this time.”

Kevin Forestieri is the editor of Mountain View Voice, joining the company in 2014. Kevin has covered local and regional stories on housing, education and health care, including extensive coverage of Santa...

Join the Conversation

No comments

  1. Why isn’t increasing the capacity of existing schools being considered?

    Huff is tiny. If it’s overcrowded let’s add some more classrooms.

    A whole new campus with an entire staff would be a waste of money.

  2. To parent:

    No, those who currently attend LASD schools will continue to attend schools in the LASD boundaries. Mountain View Whisman School District and LASD are separate entities.

    Now, LASD may re-draw its own boundaries to address the overcrowding issues there.

  3. I don’t think making Huff have a larger student body is a safe option currently. There are _significant_ traffic and safety issues related to drop off and pick up. Now if we were to bring back busing kids into school rather than having parents doing that, then I think growing Huff’s student population might be more viable.

  4. The point isn’t to fit as many kids into a campus as possible. The issue is creating walkable neighborhood schools for ALL Mountain View’s children.

  5. You’re right Huff is tiny, but adding more classrooms is not really a viable option due to space constraints. Where would they go? Across the playing field? In the middle of the playground?

  6. (1) School revenues from property taxes for MVWSD were up by 9% or so in both 2013-2014 and 2014-2015.

    (2) The district had a surplus of $6 Million in revenues less expenditures in 2012-2013.

    All this construction will rise the tax base and hence the school revenue even further! Everywhere but North Bayshore, it’s automatic. The discriminatory status of North Bayshore will either end, or the revenue sharing from the special park district will be renegotiated. Even so, development is happening all over. Plenty of money honey.

  7. Huff is on a large parcel of 11 acres owned by MVWSD. Even the park at the back of the property is owned by the school district. A large complex is leased to YMCA for Huff Kids Place, but shared back with the school. It’s much larger than most such school childcare areas, but it belongs to MVWSD.

    You could easily fit more portable classrooms on that overall parcel of land. Many different arrangements are possible and you would not need to go to 2 story buildings. About 6 acres is devoted play ground. On the edge of that adjacent to the Y buildings would be a logical place to add classrooms for general school use. Lots of schools have the childcare share playground space with Kinder play area.

  8. While talking with couple of school board members, i found out that 4 out of 5 board members are already in favor or opening new school. The whole process is mere to show they are following process.

    While in meeting they say that school has more than 500 students and student/teacher ratio as big as 21. But we dont even compare that ration with neighbourhood school district like Los altos or cupertino where student/teacher ratio is more than 24 in some schools.

    School board should follow right process first. They should tell resident that why they are opening school and impact of it and then set up boundary task force to change boundary to school. School board is not share all detail to resident before they make decisions.

Leave a comment