Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

Bay Area voters approved on Tuesday night a regional measure that would raise tolls at seven state bridges by $3 to fund $4.5 billion in transportation improvements.

The proposal, known as Regional Measure 3, received 54 percent in the nine-county area, with all precincts reporting. The measure needed the approval of a combined majority of voters in the nine counties.

Crafted by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, the measure received particularly strong support in San Francisco and Santa Clara counties. This was enough to overcome opposition from Contra Costa and Solano counties.

Overall, the majority of voters in seven of the nine counties favored Regional Measure 3 would raise tolls at seven bridges: Antioch, Benicia-Martinez, Carquinez, Dumbarton, Richmond-San Rafael, San Mateo-Hayward and the Bay Bridge (the Golden Gate is operated by its own district).

The three $1 increases ares slated to occur on Jan. 1, 2019, on Jan. 1, 2022 and on Jan. 1, 2025, and to ultimately raise the tolls from $5 to $8.

Voters in San Francisco In Santa Clara County were particularly enthusiastic, with 65 percent about 61 percent of the voters supported the measure, respectively (the Santa Clara vote was based on reports from 88 percent of the precincts).

The margin was somewhat slimmer in San Mateo County, where about 54 percent of the voters supported the measure.

The list of projects that will be funded include the extension of BART to San Jose and Santa Clara; the extension of Caltrain to San Francisco’s Transbay Terminal and an array of bus, bike and transit projects.

The list also includes $130 million improvements on the Dumbarton Corridor, including added bus service and bus-only lanes on Bayfront Expressway, an Amtrak extension to Redwood City; and $50 million for ramp improvements at the U.S. Highway 101 and State Route 92 interchange.

Carl Guardino, CEO of the Silicon Valley Leadership Group, which strongly supported the measure, said he was happy to see the early results showing Regional Measure 3 picking up majority approval in Santa Clara, Sonoma and Napa counties (in all three cases, about 60 percent of the early votes cast were in favor of RM3 as of late Tuesday night).

He expected these results to overcome greater opposition to the measure in Contra Costa and Solano counties, where the measure is far less popular.

Only 44 percent of the voters in Contra Costa County supported RM3, while 56 percent opposed it, with 87 percent of the precincts counted. And in Solano, only 30 percent voted to support the measure while 70 percent voted against it.

Though Guardino said he expected opposition from those two counties, where voters tend to be more conservative, he was heartened by strong support in Alameda County and other parts of the Bay Area.

But while he is still waiting for all the votes to come in, he noted that early voters tend to be more conservative, which suggests that the measure will garner more support as the evening progresses.

“I feel like we are going to deliver $4.5 billion in traffic improvements for the 8 million people in the Bay Area,” Guardino said shortly after the initial results were released.

Gennady Sheyner covers local and regional politics, housing, transportation and other topics for the Palo Alto Weekly, Palo Alto Online and their sister publications. He has won awards for his coverage...

Join the Conversation

No comments

  1. Nice job, Santa Clara County, we get BART to San Jose, and we don’t even have to pay for it! Great work sticking it to the poor saps that live closer to the bridges.

  2. “we get BART to San Jose, and we don’t even have to pay for it!”

    We don’t? You mean all those sales taxes will be repealed?

  3. To be fair, we shouldn’t have to pay for BART to San Jose.. Mountain View is nowhere close to San Jose, we already have Caltrain, BART doesn’t benefit Mountain View in any way.

  4. If this tax doesn’t help fund electrification and grade separations for Caltrain, then Northern SC County residents have gotten nothing out of this. As for the extension of Caltrain to San Francisco’s Transbay Terminal, what doofus thought that up? The bureaucrats desperately “managing” SF’s money sink ferry services from nowhere? Wouldn’t building a 2nd trans-bay bridge at Hunter’s Point be far more important to divert traffic around the Bay Bridge?

Leave a comment