Town Square

Post a New Topic

The whole ball field is a dugout

Original post made on May 30, 2019

McKelvey Park's baseball diamonds are back, and they're looking a little depressed. Now doubling as flood detention basins, the ball fields are 15 feet below ground.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, May 30, 2019, 1:54 PM

Comments (10)

Posted by Probably74
a resident of Cuesta Park
on May 30, 2019 at 4:33 pm

Driving by most days I've watched the new park develop. It sure is a long way down those stairs.
I'm just curious: Will there be elevators down to the playing fields so everyone can participate? Will someone be on call to fix the elevators when they stop working?


Posted by No elevators
a resident of Cuesta Park
on May 30, 2019 at 10:19 pm

There's an ADA ramp.


Posted by Brenda
a resident of Whisman Station
on May 30, 2019 at 10:39 pm

“McKelvey Park's baseball diamonds are back, and they're looking a little depressed.“ Depression is no laughing matter. The person who wrote this article needs sensitivity training on mental illness. Thanks for contributing to the stigma Mountain View Voice!


Posted by Looks Awesome
a resident of Another Mountain View Neighborhood
on May 31, 2019 at 6:46 am

I want to go watch a little league game there when it opens and I don't even have a kid that plays!
It looks a lot better that I had initially feared!


Posted by Waldo
a resident of Waverly Park
on May 31, 2019 at 7:47 am

Waldo is a registered user.

$70M for these two water basins! Hmmm...I wonder who pays for this? It's a bit suspicious that, after pushback on four basins, "...water district staff took another look at the data and found the two basins weren't necessary." I remember a Permanente Creek flood about 55 years ago, which put the intersection of Cuesta and Miramonte under about a foot of water. After that, a diversion canal was constructed, between Permanente Creek and Stevens Creek...and no more flooding. Also, at the time, there were still clear cut forest areas in the upstream watershed, created by the Santa Cruz Lumber Company. These areas have recovered, and that watershed can now absorb more rain water. Why did we need to spend the $70M? Really, why?


Posted by I am depressed, too...
a resident of Blossom Valley
on May 31, 2019 at 7:59 am

I was expecting the park to be rebuilt at ground level OVER an enclosed basin, not in it. Would have saved a lot on stairs, ADA ramps and return an attractive ground level park to the community.

I am sure they checked that the water table is lower than the playing fields, but I wonder how warm it will get for the kids playing ball in a cement box on a hot day. Might make a great music concert venue.


Posted by Here's why
a resident of Another Mountain View Neighborhood
on May 31, 2019 at 9:10 am

Rising sea levels, more king tides will add greatly to an upstream flood potential. We've seen smaller versions already over the past 20 yrs along our various creeks. EPA usually gets hit hard from San Fransiquito despite the increase in water absorption upstream.

We're now into new territory where we must consider the push from the ocean at high tides and how it affects the draining of the creeks. When it happens its like two flooding creeks running right into each other. That's why.


Posted by Waldo
a resident of Waverly Park
on May 31, 2019 at 10:10 am

Waldo is a registered user.

@ Here's Why:

The elevation for McKelvey Park is 108 feet. Here's a reference: Web Link The elevation for the other proposed flood basin will likely be at several hundred feet elevation. All this for $70M. Would the potential flood victims have been better served by investing in creekside levees...at a far lower cost? As the bay water levels rise, levees are generally inevitable at various areas around the bay anyway.


Posted by Here's Why
a resident of Another Mountain View Neighborhood
on May 31, 2019 at 10:34 am

Mmm-hmm, it's all about controlling how much water floods down to the bay at different stages of the creeks, also as there is so much more development since decades ago, more water runs off and into the creek/bay from the valley than ever before. Quote me your cost of a levee system, the areas you plan to including + the forever upkeep costs and we might compare, but I bet 70M would only cover the studies and maybe a small percentage of the legal fights with property owners, but really, speculative what-if's and maybes don't do convince many.


Posted by Depression is no laughing matter
a resident of Sylvan Park
on May 31, 2019 at 8:39 pm

In American society nothing is laughing matter lately. No wonder there is so many depressed people.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Mountain View Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

The Economics of Residential Rooftop Solar
By Sherry Listgarten | 49 comments | 4,801 views

Neighbors feeding neighbors: Rebyl Food connects Coastside community
By The Peninsula Foodist | 4 comments | 1,941 views

Dating/Dating Profile: Say What You Are Looking For
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,908 views

Why Give Up Delicious Things?
By Laura Stec | 13 comments | 1,717 views

Business tax in Palo Alto
By Steve Levy | 0 comments | 1,431 views