Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

Amid plans for dense apartment towers and tech campuses in North Bayshore, Mountain View officials have been studying the area’s transportation network and how it interacts with the rest of town.

To that end, city officials have spent more than $3 million on a variety of transportation consultants as part of Mountain View’s quest to transform the North Bayshore area, according to city officials.

Combined with the city’s considerable planning costs, this means that Mountain View has spent a grand total of $8.1 million on outside experts since the city first began pursuing an update of North Bayshore precise plan nearly eight years ago.

In an article published earlier this month, the Voice detailed the $4.6 million in planning consultant costs for updating and revising the city’s North Bayshore precise plan. In addition to those costs, the city’s Public Works Department coordinated a series of related studies to investigate the traffic impacts of the anticipated development that add up to more than $3 million.

It started in 2012, when the City Council signed off on a $500,000 study with CDM Smith. The report, the Shoreline Transportation Study, became the road map for future improvements in the area, including a reversible bus lane system and a redesigned off-ramp from Highway 101. That study also laid out long-term plans for the city to reduce the number of solo drivers.

The following year, Mountain View leaders approved a similar Shoreline Boulevard Corridor Study at a cost of $600,000. That study conducted by Nelson/Nygaard included a complex traffic analysis to prepare a variety of road modifications intended to speed up traffic flow.

More recently, city officials have been interested in preparing an automated transit line to connect North Bayshore to the downtown area. This pursuit was launched in 2016 with a $300,000 contract with Lea + Elliott to investigate different transit technologies

The City Council followed up this study last week by approving a second automated guideway study, at a cost of $850,000 (see the Voice’s story). About $350,000 of the cost is being picked up by the area’s tech companies, including Google.

Last year, the City Council had approved a $935,000 study with the firm TJKM to study specific transit improvements, including a transit bridge across Stevens Creek and a new Highway 101 underpass leading to Charleston Road. The study also examine a future system for mitigating and measuring traffic impacts from residential development. In May, council members decided to add an additional $135,000 to this contract so that TJKM engineers could study different master plan scenarios for the Shoreline gateway property.

The study costs for the North Bayshore area do not include the extensive hours spent by city staff.

Join the Conversation

No comments

  1. $3 Million

    That could fill a lot of potholes and store a lot of water for drought years.

    Instead, we have a stack of paper that tells us that if we pack a ton more people into this city, the traffic will get worse.

    Bravo, City Council. I’m sure you couldn’t have figured that out on your own.

  2. It’s my understanding that the bayshore funds do not come out of the cities general fund (our tax dollars) but is an additional tax from the businesses in the bayshore corridor. With that being said, IT DOES NOT MATTER WHERE THE MONEY IS COMING FROM! The city needs to be more responsible with ALL tax money! 8 million dollars over 8 years with nothing to show for it but multiple opinions is ridiculous, and borderline criminal! The city staff should not be in charge of this money! It should be handed over to a commision of business owners in the bayshore area to determine it’s use. Lets see if the business minds of these multi million dollar companies can do matter then the bureaucrats!

  3. To me this is pretty bad.

    Many people are making a living but producing no real products.

    Why do we spend all of this money and wind up with nothing but paperwork?

    It almost appears like a scam. THe city is participating an nothing but a scam. When will a shovel ever be in use?

  4. @Concerned. Shoreline is a Quasi-Redevelopment district in the phrase of the CA state finance people. IT GETS IT’s TAX WINDFALL BY DIVERTING GENERAL FUND PROPERTY TAXES away from other agencies – like, for instance, the Mountain View Whisman elementary school district. This is a big tax loss for those other agencies.

    MVWSD is the looser of $9,203,291.67 of guranteeded general property tax funds. (about 1/2 is ‘shared’ in a temporary contract).

    Total tax revenue shift into Shoreline? $38,774,400.51 for the 2018-19 tax year. County of Santa Clara ,Tax Rates & Information, page H-9 at the very end.

    https://www.sccgov.org/sites/fin/Controller-Treasurer%20Department/Property%20Tax%20Apportionment/Documents/Tax%20Rate%20Book%202018-2019.pdf

  5. WOW,

    I know most of these posts would be likely to disagree with me.

    But it looks like we are in TOTAL agreement in this case.

    This has been nothing but a means to make moeny without producing any real new housing or anything else for that matter.

    When will the City Council’s ego’s stop writing checks that their “butts” can’t cash?

    Top Gun.

  6. Steve Nelson,

    You are on the right rtrack but the real cost to Mountain View was $22,495,619.89 because the transferred costs came from the City of Mountain View, Mountain View Elementary School and Mountain View-Los Altos High School from that page.

    Now if there are 70,000 people in Mountain View, that means $321.37 from the City Taxes are being taken from each City Citizen.

    And so far Mountain View Shoreline Community is not even built yet. It hasn’t even started. Where is this money going?

Leave a comment