Town Square

Post a New Topic

Despite looming deficit, Santa Clara County supervisors reject sales tax hike for the November ballot

Original post made on Aug 4, 2020

The Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors will not place a sales tax measure on the November ballot this year, after two supervisors on Tuesday pushed back on the idea of taxing residents to offset the deficit.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, August 4, 2020, 1:54 PM

Comments (4)

9 people like this
Posted by Dan Waylonis
a resident of Jackson Park
on Aug 4, 2020 at 8:19 pm

Dan Waylonis is a registered user.

No. This is not reasonable, especially in light of the fact that the "[...] budget has ballooned by 84% over a period of seven years". Cut the county spending. Just like everyone else has cut their own spending.


4 people like this
Posted by SRB
a resident of St. Francis Acres
on Aug 4, 2020 at 9:22 pm

SRB is a registered user.

A bit hypocritical for Joe Simitian and Mike Wasserman to oppose the County Sales Tax. "Both worried that the county already has a high tax rate, and a sales tax measure would be regressive and disproportionately affect residents who can least afford it." ...yet both had no problem endorsing an equally regressive sales tax for Caltrain ....minutes before.


1 person likes this
Posted by Steven Nelson
a resident of Cuesta Park
on Aug 5, 2020 at 8:47 am

Steven Nelson is a registered user.

I totally agree with my County Supervisor and others who "worry about" the regressive nature of general sales taxes (and same-per-property-size 'parcel taxes'). I especially agree with elected officials who VOTE NO on this type of revenue, rather than 'just talk'. If you don't walk the walk, 'talking the talk' just don't matter!

THANKS JOE!

[now - a county wide general sales tax on real estate - a Transfer Tax - based on a very small percentage of the Sale Price. That is a form of Sales Tax that hits wealth, and that I could support]


Like this comment
Posted by Steven Goldstein
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Aug 5, 2020 at 11:34 am

Steven Goldstein is a registered user.

As a business trained person, I find "sales" taxes to be the worst approach because all that does is encourages the wealthy to shop for the places with the lowest sales taxes and make purchases there.

Or what really does happen is that large purchases are done out of the country and brought here. Since there is no way to enforce taxes on that action.

I wish we would simply have a transaction tax on all money transactions. This includes buying and selling stocks, bonds, in kind product sharing. Like whether a landlord shares ownership with a third party service provider like Zeus Living or AirBnB.

If this were done at say 10% and a person bought $100,000 worth of stock than $10,000 would be collected and the point of investment. Granted, this would "depress" stock prices, but many investors would likely be a lot more careful in investing anyway because they pay up front the cost of the purchases. It may "slow" down transactions as well, but that is not necessarily bad given people with think more carefully on their investments too.

There is an argument that acting too fast is the largest risk to markets, involving speculation. Speculation is simply gambling in another word. And a lot of business today involves gambling with other peoples money. This is called leverage. Leverage is debt. Which means people are gambling with money they don't even have. This was fine until the crisis of COVID.

COVID is disrupted so much that the debt is collapsing all businesses that are not able to be called "essential" as long as COVID reigns over us. The financial sector is developing such a toxic level of credit regarding all kinds especially business, similar to the housing crisis, that it will see this house of cards come down.

The only way out of this is to accept the permanent loss of values, in effect right off the toxic debt. And we cannot try the same solution as 2007 because it was in actuality a failure. We never recovered the values, jobs, or earnings up to the level we should have been without the crisis that was made by the people involved in the Great Recession.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.


Get important election coverage sent straight to your inbox daily.

Vons drops Korean fried chicken on downtown Redwood City
By Elena Kadvany | 1 comment | 7,095 views

Is there a polite way to say "Too much plastic"?
By Sherry Listgarten | 31 comments | 4,074 views

What I will remember about Ruth Bader Ginsburg
By Diana Diamond | 5 comments | 1,993 views

Premarital and Couples: See "Buck" for Couple's Tips
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 796 views

 

Benefiting local non-profits

The 36th annual Moonlight Run and Walk is Friday evening, October 2, wherever you are! Proceeds go to the Palo Alto Weekly Holiday Fund, benefiting local non-profits that serve families and children in Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties. Join us under the light of the full Harvest Moon on a 5K walk, 5K run, 10K run or half marathon.

Register Today!