Town Square

Post a New Topic

Guest opinion: California must not undermine the advance of clean energy

Original post made on Feb 27, 2022

California state Sen. Josh Becker touts the big advancements in solar power across California, but raises concerns that changes proposed by the California Public Utilities Commission could slow progress towards clean energy.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Sunday, February 27, 2022, 8:49 AM

Comments (4)

Posted by SRB
a resident of St. Francis Acres
on Feb 27, 2022 at 10:49 am

SRB is a registered user.

I too agree "that more support is essential for low-income Californians to participate in clean energy transformation".

Before looking at a solar tax, how about doing all we can to make (or keep) electricity more affordable than its alternatives.

Next month, PG&E and SVCE (and other CCCAs) will raise their electricity generation rates by 8-10%. PG&E justifies that increase by its reliance on natural gas to produce electricity. SVCE doesn't even bother to justify their increase, it seems to be done because they can.



Posted by quiet_resident
a resident of Waverly Park
on Feb 28, 2022 at 4:12 pm

quiet_resident is a registered user.

We agree. However, it's not enough to fund the solar roof program if new house flip rebuilds by contractors who are looking for a quick buck are allowed to shade the legacy solar panel investments. The Solar program needs to protect access to the sun. These new monster homes are not green and not affordable so why are we allowing them?


Posted by Longtime resident
a resident of Waverly Park
on Feb 28, 2022 at 4:47 pm

Longtime resident is a registered user.

Josh, two things:
1) if nearly half of recent solar growth occurred with working/middle income neighborhoods, do we really need to focus on "more support ... for low-income Californians to participate in clean energy transformation"? This seems a red herring issue by CPUC change supporters.
2) I'd really like to see more support for low carbon energy of all types, especially nuclear which should be replacing hydrocarbons as reliable base load.


Posted by chris aoki
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Mar 1, 2022 at 1:45 pm

chris aoki is a registered user.

I second the motion for non-exclusionary support of zero
carbon energy production, such as nuclear fission.

And to make our intentions clearer, avoid loaded, ambiguous
terms like “clean” and “green” in favor of unambiguous language
such as “carbon-free”.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Mountain View Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

E-Bikes on Open Space Trails: Yes or No?
By Sherry Listgarten | 17 comments | 4,286 views

Comcast, what are you doing to us?
By Diana Diamond | 16 comments | 2,789 views

Why the owner of Burlingame's Rasa gave up a Michelin star
By The Peninsula Foodist | 0 comments | 1,859 views

Gifts and Belongings
By Chandrama Anderson | 2 comments | 1,805 views

Idaho Hot Springs and Yellowstone – Travelin’ Solo
By Laura Stec | 0 comments | 724 views