Town Square

Post a New Topic

Mountain View's RV parking enforcement postponed again, set to begin in July

Original post made on Apr 1, 2022

Mountain View's controversial RV parking ban won't be enforced through July 4, following an agreement between the city and legal advocacy groups that have sued to overturn the ordinances.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, April 1, 2022, 1:15 PM

Comments (20)

Posted by Otto Maddox
a resident of Monta Loma
on Apr 1, 2022 at 7:28 pm

Otto Maddox is a registered user.

72 hour parking violations. Easy.
Expired registrations. Easy.
Waste tanks leaking onto the street. Easy.

Even silly stuff like no front license plates. Easy.

All these are easy violations that have nothing to do with the size of the vehicle.

Why aren't these being enforced? Some of these vehicles have plants growing underneath them they have been parked in one spot so long.

Instead we cover the entire city in new signs, that can't even be enforced.

Posted by Steven Nelson
a resident of Cuesta Park
on Apr 2, 2022 at 10:13 am

Steven Nelson is a registered user.

Right Otto - I and 'many of us' also agree. Even my dear 'Lenny' agrees that No BIG street RVs parked in lanes right next to 'sign marked' and roadway marked Bicycle Lanes.

Otto's #2, #3 ("over 6 months"), #4 are all easy observable/ resident documentable CA Vehicle Code violations ('against the law' state-wide)

Please - Rule of Law - document (photo) these violations and clearly send in a Paper Copy complaint to the

Mountain View Police Department: re Traffic Enforcement
1000 Villa Street
Mountain View, CA 94041

old 'lucite' version of reporting to police / they should send U an 'old school' paper letter response - With a # to 'reference' your report. YOU CANNOT report this on-line " ( ) Traffic Complaint" in online [File a Police Report]

I think (hope) this will get your complaint, Officially 'into the record' (for you and City Council)

Posted by Frank Richards
a resident of Cuesta Park
on Apr 2, 2022 at 1:21 pm

Frank Richards is a registered user.

This is such an absurd, self-inflicted boondoggle the city backed itself into. They were presented with so many off-ramps here, but folks like Lisa Matichak and Margaret Abe-Koga have their constituencies that they need to satisfy. Now, here we are with a costly ballot measure, neverending costly litigation, expensive ugly signs throughout the city, all for no real positive benefit to anyone.

Posted by ivg
a resident of Another Mountain View Neighborhood
on Apr 3, 2022 at 8:15 pm

ivg is a registered user.

I wonder how many people would have voted for the RV ban if they'd known that the signs alone would cost $1M. How many RVs were there at the time? 300? That's $30,000 per RV -- enough to rent an apartment for a year.

Posted by JustAWorkingStiff
a resident of Another Mountain View Neighborhood
on Apr 4, 2022 at 12:08 pm

JustAWorkingStiff is a registered user.

Our votes don't matter.
A vote resulted in 57% in favor of the Ordinance

We now know that neither our court system or politicians can be trusted in MV
This behavior should inform all voters how untrustworthy the system is.
Voters should take remedial action.

Please note:
Lenny Siegel and his team opposed letting the entire city vote on the issue
A city-wide vote is a legitimate way of settling a disagreement between different groups.
Yet the process is being disrupted by special interest groups
Opposing views are met by name calling, character disparagement, and calling people liars
(The last point was just doing Randy's job for him in advance)

Posted by lan
a resident of Monta Loma
on Apr 4, 2022 at 12:39 pm

lan is a registered user.

Got it! I can now rent a storage container and put it on the street! Until July. Will save lots of money in personal storage.

And the contractor who has taken over a good portion of our street with his three cars, two trailers will be very happy that he continue as he has for the past 2 years! No enforcement. Never mind that he double parks his cars while chatting with his buddies and has blocked off a huge portion of the street for two years.

And the garbage and refuse on streets with trailers? No worries. Makes Mountain View look like a garbage dump in those areas, but who cares?

To Mountain View City Council - get a spine, and do what's right for all of us in Mountain View.

Posted by Steven Nelson
a resident of Cuesta Park
on Apr 5, 2022 at 12:58 pm

Steven Nelson is a registered user.

@JustAWorking Stiff - it would be also very, very nice, if you would also be a Serious Student of public political affairs - That is: how local/state government and laws work. (local with state / CA is "sovereign" = CA Constitution and 'case law" prevails ALWAYS)

sometimes known as The Rule of Law (and U do not need to be a lawyer to understand)

@Stiff - then U might be taken more seriously.
1) your VOTES on a local issue / subserviant to the CA State Constitution DO NOT MATTER when the measure itself is found - by the 'workings of the state judiciary' (levels) to be in violation of the CA State Constitution
-"Stiff" - you get IMO a Not Pass on this topic. Look up "judicial review" in your civics textbook.
2) can't be trusted "in Mountain View" - The court system that is working is In the County of Santa Clara. This is not a local 'peoples court'. :). BTW - I wouldn't want to live in "The Peoples Republic of Stiffs"
3) "voters should take remedial action". ?
[ "when in the course of Human Events" ha ha - this hardly IMO raises to the level of armed rebelion / or Een wasting more of my TAX DOLLARS on some truely 'lame' 'voter action' ???

Peace & Love,
former Politician and always 'politico' Steven Nelson
resident / USA Citizen / and darn-sure-Voter in the City of Mountain View, California.

Posted by Steven Nelson
a resident of Cuesta Park
on Apr 5, 2022 at 1:15 pm

Steven Nelson is a registered user.

OPPS. (read better / write less retractions)
This is a FEDERAL COURT / so it is USA Constutional issues that are under consideration. I'd have filed under CA COnstitution , in the Santa Clara Co. courts. But then / the final result would have to end up further littigated / up to CA Appelate level, and important enough for a "Published" opinion from that CA Appelate Ct.

Maybe - juristiction of this USA FEDERAL COURT covers more ground both geographicly and legaly (or there is existing 'case law' in the FED court system that makes the leagal push FROM US "NO on C" easier.

Voice reporter Kevin? Why FED District Ct and not County of Santa Clara Superior Ct?

(thanks 4 the Direct LINK to the court filing public document - / 'nother subscriber/supporter')

Posted by Johnny Yuma
a resident of Blossom Valley
on Apr 6, 2022 at 6:27 pm

Johnny Yuma is a registered user.

Why I have to constantly remind The Voice that that RV dwellers are not homeless Is beyond me. RVs ARE their homes. Wake up…

Posted by B Black
a resident of Another Mountain View Neighborhood
on Apr 7, 2022 at 3:27 pm

B Black is a registered user.

Did the City of Mountain View begin a program to allow parking and social services to RV’s and cars inhabitance?
Is the City pursuing this? Who were originators of election measure?
I believe the people of Mt. View care about those living on the streets. The people have spoken in the last election.
The City and County must give resources to get these vehicles, a place to park and clean their waste also get social services which they offered at Shoreline. Clean this mess up Mt. View City Council. Clean our streets, even though you can bring a horse to water but can’t make it drink.

Posted by Arik Singh
a resident of Rengstorff Park
on Apr 8, 2022 at 9:35 am

Arik Singh is a registered user.

It is the moral responsibility of Mountain View and its more affluent residents to accommodate the RV dwellers, many of whom are not technically homeless but merely economically deprived.

Cuesta and Rengstorff Parks could also be utilized for overnight camping and after hours RV parking providing the vehicles are registered, fully insured, and safe to operate on the streets.

And there is a lot of extra open space at both parks for short-term overnight camping when the parks are closed.

Posted by Stephen
a resident of Rengstorff Park
on Apr 8, 2022 at 10:46 am

Stephen is a registered user.

We’re all entitled to our opinions about moral obligations, housing inequities, etc but the people of Mountain View have voted. I look forward to the RV ban being enforced one day. Or maybe we can partner with neighboring cities like Palo Alto and Los Altos to help create more RV parking lots or allow the RV dwellers to park on their streets. Legal challenges by the current groups clearly don’t represent what the majority of MV residents want. Please advance your agenda somewhere else.

Posted by Marissa Long
a resident of Blossom Valley
on Apr 8, 2022 at 11:40 am

Marissa Long is a registered user.

> Legal challenges by the current groups clearly don’t represent what the majority of MV residents want.

That is besides the point. During the Jim Crow era, many southerners were in favor of racial discrimination which doesn't make a majority mindset right.

> Please advance your agenda somewhere else.

Without any moral compass, we are doomed to further inhumanity towards those less fortunate.

Those more concerned about their residential real estate property values and superficial street appearances should consider another community in which to reside.

There is a transient motorhome that parks in our neighborhood after hours and then departs prior to 6AM.

What harm is there in that?

Posted by Steven Nelson
a resident of Cuesta Park
on Apr 8, 2022 at 2:40 pm

Steven Nelson is a registered user.

ah - @Marissa -
I feel the fresh air blowing - just reading your posting. / and a Name, a real name / a Rose by any name ...

Southerners at the time of my [long ago, going toward ancient] birth also had A LOCK on who voted (not "Colored"). "White Only". as much as they could enforce. With bat(s) or bullets or rope. "Strange fruit".

and in the Russian Federation - who votes? and what choice of candidate(s)?

Stephen %#@$# (whatsyourname?) / the Rule of Law in the USA seems much more complicated than you understand.

Sorry - it it clear. Like that pop radio station I recently 'tuned out' - a call in quiz 'contestent' could Not Name Who "the President of the United States" was!!! Stephen - U have been graded - "D" in Civics. You know "legal challanges" and "what the majority" words are - but Not Their Context and Relationship.

Posted by Stephen
a resident of Rengstorff Park
on Apr 8, 2022 at 3:14 pm

Stephen is a registered user.

[Post removed at poster's request]

Posted by Gil Fuentes
a resident of Whisman Station
on Apr 9, 2022 at 11:39 am

Gil Fuentes is a registered user.

I suspect it is the rundown and disheveled appearance of these RVs have most residents concerned.

If the RVs were Mercedes Sprinters, no one would be complaining because they would enhance the various neighborhoods with appearances of affluence.

Solution: establish a state/county/city grant program to provide eligible recipients with nicer RVs!

Posted by Greg David
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Apr 12, 2022 at 10:09 pm

Greg David is a registered user.

When the ACLU wins, what is the city going to do with the $1M worth of signs?

@ivg. Someone needs a remedial math course. But I get your point.

Posted by Polomom
a resident of Waverly Park
on Apr 20, 2022 at 6:14 pm

Polomom is a registered user.

Greg David, apparently the Public Works Dept is planning of removing the NO PARKING 2am to 6am signs in front of a couple of businesses. Letters went out. We have not heard anything about this new twist. These signs went up in locations where RVs seriously blocked vision for people exiting business drive ways.

Posted by SRB
a resident of St. Francis Acres
on Apr 20, 2022 at 9:19 pm

SRB is a registered user.


How many customers exit a business driveway between 2am and 6am?

Posted by Polomom
a resident of Waverly Park
on Apr 21, 2022 at 9:19 am

Polomom is a registered user.

SRB the RVs like in any other location never moved.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Mountain View Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

E-Bikes on Open Space Trails: Yes or No?
By Sherry Listgarten | 17 comments | 4,292 views

Comcast, what are you doing to us?
By Diana Diamond | 16 comments | 2,794 views

Why the owner of Burlingame's Rasa gave up a Michelin star
By The Peninsula Foodist | 0 comments | 1,876 views

Gifts and Belongings
By Chandrama Anderson | 2 comments | 1,809 views

Idaho Hot Springs and Yellowstone – Travelin’ Solo
By Laura Stec | 0 comments | 730 views