Town Square

Post a New Topic

Concerns about job losses, national security

Original post made on May 22, 2012

With rescue missions, disaster relief efforts and two major employers depending on the unique aspects of Moffett Federal Airfield, closing it down could be a big mistake. At least that's the opinion of Congresswoman Anna Eshoo and city officials from Mountain View and Sunnyvale in letters recently sent to NASA.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, May 22, 2012, 12:10 PM

Comments (5)

Like this comment
Posted by Spelling police
a resident of Rex Manor
on May 22, 2012 at 5:01 pm

The plural of spacecraft is spacecraft.

Like this comment
Posted by Otto Maddox
a resident of Monta Loma
on May 22, 2012 at 8:13 pm

Is there some reason they can't ship satellites out of San Jose or San Francisco?

I find it hard to believe next closest suitable airfield is McClellan. If the President of the United States can take off from SFO (which he has) then I'm sure a sattelite can as well.

I don't know if Eshoo has been paying attention but the U.S. no longer has a manned space program. One less thing this rescue squadron needs to worry about right?

When our military becomes just another welfare program (for companies) it will lose effectiveness. It already has in lots of ways. We end up with weapons the military doesn't want and we keep bases open the military would rather close.

All because of where these weapons are built or what district the base is in. Not because of the role they play in our national defense.

The military gave up Moffett long ago. Seems like no one is paying attention to that fact. Now NASA is saying they don't need it.

Time to say goodbye to Moffett once and for all.

Like this comment
Posted by cd
a resident of Rex Manor
on May 23, 2012 at 12:02 am

Loral and Lockheed build satellites in Bay Area, and their revenue are in tens of billions. They employed thousands of high-paid engineers and scientist locally. Shutting down Moffett will drive them out, and thousands of families will be impacted.

There are not much manufacturing job left in Bay Area. Let's be careful what we wish for.

Like this comment
Posted by Allison
a resident of Shoreline West
on May 23, 2012 at 5:32 pm

SFO and OAK are built on fill land. Both SUSTAINED DAMAGE in the last quake.

Once you lose an airport, you will never get it back. The bay area has NO military installations if Moffett Field is bulldozed, not to mention the historic buildings on base as well.

Moffett works for military shipping because it's private, out of the way. While so can handle the president, it shut down the airspace completely and caused massive delays. At NUQ, it affects Much less traffic.

Because what we need more of in the Bay Area is MORE HOUSING!

If you're not a fan of planes flying over...why did you move next to an import int he first place? I can assure you the base was there well before your house was...

Like this comment
Posted by mpumas
a resident of another community
on May 30, 2012 at 11:38 am

After looking at the NASA position and the many comments here and with over 50 years of experience at Moffett, here is my 2 cents worth:

1. After NASA aircraft were transferred to Edwards Air Force Base, the flying mission for NASA Ames went away. NASA has no aircraft at Moffett.

2. As such, NASA wants to get out of the airfield business and wants the GSA to look for others to be the landlord. That could be the Air National Guard or local government. There are many, including Google and NASA, who would pay the $7 million operating costs to keep the field open.

3. The east side of the field is not part of the NASA wrequest. The Air National Guard is firmly entrenched and its time for the Coast Guard to relocate their long range rescue aircraft from McCellan to Moffett. Commonality of aircraft between the two organizations at the same location makes sense to me.

4. It is time to allow the freight carriers to relocate to Moffett. It is an ideal location with quick access to the freeway and San Jose, east bay and the pennisula. Early morning landings over the bay and afternoon/evening take-offs over the bay will mitigate the noise problem.

5. I can't see the airfield closing but can see NASA not being the landlord.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Fu Lam Mum shutters temporarily in Mountain View
By Elena Kadvany | 5 comments | 2,207 views

What Are Your Gifts that Must Be Shared?
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 1,513 views


Best Of Mountain View ballot is here

It's time to decide what local business is worthy of the title "Best Of Mountain View" — and you get to decide! Cast your ballot online. Voting ends May 29th. Stay tuned for the results in the July 21st issue of the Mountain View Voice.