News

County seeks new site for north county homeless shelter

The Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors unanimously voted Tuesday to find a replacement for the north county's cold-weather homeless shelter at the Sunnyvale Armory, now being demolished.

The shelter closed its doors for the last time on March 31, and "we are now without a facility to serve the 136 folks who put their heads down there every night, during the four cold-weather months of the year," December through March, said Supervisor Joe Simitian, whose district spans Mountain View and Palo Alto, among other north county cities. "This has raised very legitimate concerns about what are the next steps."

In recent years the county has moved towards a "housing first" model that seeks to fund subsidized housing for the chronically homeless, including 124 such units to be built at the Sunnyvale Armory site. (The National Guard decided to end its deal with the county to use the site for free.) But housing funds are scarce, which is why Simitian and fellow supervisor David Cortese proposed the move to find a new shelter site.

"I think 'housing first' is long-term strategy and I think it's important we have a long-term strategy," Simitian said. "But right here, right now, people need a roof over their head."

The Armory was one of three major shelters for the homeless in the county, the others being in San Jose and Morgan Hill. Simitian noted that in the northern half of the county there are now "a dozen communities with roughly a third of the county's population that don't have a large shelter in place."

According to the 2013 county homelessness survey, Mountain View had 136 unsheltered homeless that year, while the northern 12 cities in the county (basically the entire county minus San Jose, Morgan Hill, Gilroy and unincorporated areas such as San Martin), had 1,098 of the county's 5,674 unsheltered homeless.

Simitian added that without such a shelter, other residents "shouldn't be surprised" if some of those 1,098 homeless "are going to be out in the neighborhood" where, he noted, they have inevitably caused a "quality of life issue" for other residents.

As now required by law, Mountain View city staff released a general plan housing element report this week identifying areas of the city where such a shelter could go. The report identifies the "general industrial" zoned areas in the city totaling 248 acres, particularly several dozen lots on Pioneer Way. It's an area where auto shops, offices and warehouses are now common. The report says most of the street's parcels are large enough to accommodate 139 homeless and would be within walking distance of the Evelyn Avenue light rail station and downtown transit station, though the street is separated from downtown by Highway 85.

Supervisors and members of the public who spoke at the meeting all supported Simitian's call for a new shelter somewhere in the north county, including Sunnyvale resident Judy Pierce. She said she represented a group of Sunnyvale residents who have taken the task upon themselves of trying to help the homeless once served by the Armory and who have no place to go, such as when a rain storm hit in the days after it closed. She thanked Simitian and others for taking on the issue.

Jenny Niklaus of Homefirst, a nonprofit that ran the Sunnyvale Armory shelter under its former name, EHC Lifebuilders, also supported the search for a new location.

"A 'hot and a cot' doesn't end homelessness, but if we consider how we can marry it with things that end homelessness we have an opportunity to transform the cold-weather model," Niklaus said of services social workers provide to help the homeless get back on their feet.

While finding a site for a homeless shelter where neighbors won't complain may be one challenge, "In this particular market finding the right place at a cost that can be managed is more likely to be the challenge," Simitian said. The city has annually budgeted only $200,000 to run the Armory site, where no rent was charged to the county.

There is also an idea that's been floated for "warming stations," which would house the homeless only during bad weather in various locations, such as churches.

"In some ways we are more likely to be successful with a single (shelter) than with a dozen smaller venues, all of which raise neighborhood concerns," Simitian said of the "roaming" warming station model. "The Sunnyvale Armory was right across the street and next door to residential development and managed to make it work. But I don't think that (is the sort of situation) anyone is anticipating."

One formerly homeless man, Michael Fletcher, said he had been helped by the Sunnyvale shelter. "This is Silicon Valley," he said, addressing the supervisors. "If we could come up with all these modern technologies, for the life of me I can't figure out why we can't get it together (for the homeless). Because that could be your brother or your sister."

"We need to find a replacement shelter and we need to do it pretty darn quickly because those cold-weather months are coming," Simitian said.

Comments

Posted by Hmm, a resident of Monta Loma
on Apr 21, 2014 at 3:41 pm

How about building a new one on the site where they destroyed the old one? Makes too much sense i guess.

Why did they tear it down in the first place? Why is the armory kicking out these people? Could it be money and greed?


Posted by David Harkness, a resident of Shoreline West
on Apr 21, 2014 at 6:30 pm

@Hmm

The article states that the armory was provided rent free for years by the National Guard. I assume this means a mix of federal and state funding via tax-payers, but I won't claim to know the particulars.

If that's the case, it seems reasonable to fund the site from the appropriate coffers, be that private, non-profit, or the correct tax-payer-funded budget. Hiding one project within another is not acceptable for public projects.

I see no greed involved here.

That being said, I do agree that if this location can be repurposed, there's no point in demolishing it. However, keep in mind that an armory is not ideally suited to living quarters, though it clearly beats open air.


Posted by DC, a resident of North Whisman
on Apr 21, 2014 at 8:05 pm

The Armory was sold due to federal dollar cost savings to a developer of new homes. So every town must provide housing for the homeless in that town. How do you determine which town they live in?


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Acai bowls, headed to downtown Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 4 comments | 2,569 views

Freshman Blues Don't Mean Wrong College
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 2 comments | 1,108 views

Background and Ideas for the Comp Plan
By Steve Levy | 21 comments | 1,064 views

Give me a moment
By Jessica T | 0 comments | 666 views

My Experience Using Tugg.com To Host A Movie At Shoreline
By Angela Hey | 0 comments | 520 views