|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Asked about the big issues facing Mountain View, the city’s new mayor, Pat Showalter, doesn’t need to ponder for long. It’s “housing, housing and more housing.”
The city needs to build more residences, plan it out better and find ways to keep families and households living here without mortgaging their future, she says. Trying to tackle those goals, she expects, will dominate the coming year as she occupies the city’s top seat.
Having just completed her first year on the council, Showalter on Tuesday night was picked by her colleagues to take the city’s helm at a tense time in local politics. Mountain View is experiencing a building boom like never before, with records amounts of office and residential development being proposed. But while some see a robust economy on the rise, others see the scourge of gentrification. A growing segment of the community is complaining the city could be changing for the worse, forcing low-wage earners to go elsewhere.
At Tuesday’s City Council meeting, Showalter won the honorary position in a unanimous vote, making her the city’s point-person for 2016. At the same meeting, the council picked Ken Rosenberg to serve as vice mayor.
As she takes the gavel, Showalter says she is cognizant that these polarizing housing issues aren’t exactly new, nor can they be reasonably expected to be resolved in her limited term. Nevertheless, the city’s new mayor says she intends to be a steady hand on the tiller as the city implements and fine-tunes a slate of new housing policies.
Showalter speaks highly of the collaborative and courteous relationship between council members. But that doesn’t mean she always marches in lockstep and housing is one area where she sometimes parts ways with her colleagues.
Last year, as a groundswell of tenants urged the city to do something to curb rising rents, Showalter was one of the few council members who wanted to take immediate action to freeze rents while a formal rent-control program could be studied. She still believes such a “cooling-off period” would have provided the time and flexibility needed for thoughtful policies.
But her plan never gained traction, and the council instead produced a hodgepodge of new programs including beefed-up mediation and rental subsidies ideas that didn’t win much support among renters or landlords. As the old adage says, a good compromise leaves both sides dissatisfied — but of course, the same can be said of a bad compromise.
Ultimately, the deal was a letdown, Showalter says, but she asserted that now her role is to try to make that deal work as successfully as possible.
“I’m disappointed, but at the same time, you always have to do what’s politically available,” she explains. “We’ve heard all these hours of testimony from people (facing rising rents) and now following through on that should be a huge priority.”
In the coming weeks, as the council adds specifics to these housing programs, she says she intends to push for low thresholds and tight language to protect renters. At a minimum, she says she would want binding arbitration to be available for any tenant facing a rent hike of at least two times the regional consumer price index (about 5 percent). To a degree, she believes the city’s recent rash of rent hikes are a short-term crisis that will eventually settle down as the economy cools off.
The new mayor also puts some hopes in the city’s long-term housing remedies, particularly its plans to build new housing throughout North Bayshore. She describes the area as a grand opportunity for housing, but it is up to city officials to ensure that growth is implemented intelligently.
One of her goals during her term will be to strengthen outreach and collaboration with other Silicon Valley cities to address the mutual troubles, such as affordable housing, traffic and shared resources.
In some ways, these priorities are nothing new for Showalter, said former mayor Jac Siegel. The two served together for a period on the city’s Planning Commission, and even then Showalter showed a strong interest in residential issues and the so-called job-housing imbalance in Mountain View. Then and now, she favored higher-density homes as a way to do more with the limited available land, Siegel recalled.
“I’m sure she’ll make a great mayor … she’ll grab the situation and do well with it,” Siegel said. “Pat is very smart and she’s an engineer she’s able to understand the technical things from staff really easily.”
One problem that may arise is the workload. The demands of being on the council can easily match a full-time job, but when you’re mayor that time commitment “triples,” Siegel said, as the post comes with a litany of ribbon-cuttings, proclamations, special events and other ceremonies.
Showalter, who works as a civil engineer for the Santa Clara Valley Water District, intends to balance her day job with her mayoral duties. Her employer “generously” allowed her to switch to a part-time schedule, she says. But she did express some concerns about handling the demands. Coming from a technical background, she is accustomed to reviewing each line of information in front of her, but that level of detail often becomes impossible for processing a 500-page meeting packet.
“That’s scary for me,” she said. “I’m used to getting into detail and understanding things clearly, but things get thrown to us really quickly and I can’t delve into it at the same level.”
Operating as a high-level decision-maker often means relying on the best judgment of city staff and consultants. Showalter says she’s also been impressed by the level of research that civic-minded community members invest into city business, and they often provide valuable advice for elected leaders. She hopes to keep that dialogue open by continuing a mayoral tradition of having a regular coffee meetings with anyone who wants to talk.
Those meetings dubbed “Chats with Pat” are being scheduled at 11 a.m. on the second Tuesday of each month and at 3 p.m. on the last Saturday of each month at Le Boulanger cafe at 650 Castro St.






Congratulations, Pat!
“Housing, housing, housing.”???
Transportation/congestion didn’t make the top 3? Yikes.
So, no issues with Pat. But can someone clear up for me why MV even picks a mayor, since the role is mostly ceremonial and even seems to rotate from council person to council person almost in a rotation? I am genuinely curious how one mayor makes for is different city than another in our system.
Congratulations to Pat. I’m sure she will do a great job.
We need a mayor to lead the council meetings, set the agenda with the City Manager, be the front person for the council to meet visitors, make committee appointments, cut ribbons, speak to reporters, etc. These activities give this person a little more power, and the residents sometimes think the mayor can do anything so complaints are heard.
Jim C
Former Mayor
Thanks for the clarification Jim.
Just a quick question; Do you think it’s appropriate for a Mayor to have straight-faced lied to constituents during her campaign about her position on a major and divisive infrastructure project?
Do any city governments along the Peninsula have full-time mayors?
Congratulations to Pat and Ken, looking forward to a prosperous 2016 for Mountain View.
God help us. Showalter, as far as I know, never apologized for breaking her campaign promise to oppose the VTA’s plan to ruin El Camino Real with dedicated bus lanes. Rosenberg broke his promise and voted pro-VTA too, but at least he had the common sense to say that he might reconsider his pro-VTA vote in the future. Still, I will never trust anything that Showalter or Rosenberg ever promise again. They have negative credibility with me.
Right off the bat, housing housing and housing, Just what we do not need anymore of. I guess she doesn’t care about traffic, since all of us will be using some sort of public transportation in the near future.
If this is free America, then the people should make the decisions of major importance to our city, not a handful of puppets in the hands of big corporations or special interest groups.
I’m glad that we have a Mayor that is supporting the BRT project along El Camino. It’s important to have someone that represents the viewpoint of most of it’s residents and not just a vocal, mostly right-wing minority opinion.
Congratulations MV for continuing to be a leader!
@false, I guess you like the lies the Left-wingers tell you? Soon you won’t have any liberty to talk of.
Just like the rest of the left-winger, you are also a liar, since this is not supported by the majority which you claim. Show us the proof!! You have none.
And what is your proof, sport? And shouting “left-wing lies” isn’t proof…but if you could actually think for yourself, you would know that.
“Housing, housing, housing…”
Let’s not forget that in the last election, landlords spent heavily ($90,000) to elect Rosenberg and Showalter, attempting to hide the source of the money by diverting it through a shell organization that was cynically named the “Neighborhood Empowerment Coalition.” Here’s a Voice article with details: http://www.mv-voice.com/news/2014/10/23/outside-money-floods-city-council-race. This was probably legal under the Citizens United decision, but it corrupted our election. The voluntary spending limit that all the candidates agreed to ($22,689) was rendered meaningless.
VOTE OUT SHOWATER-SIEGEL-ROSENBERG
THEY WHERE ENDORSED BY THE MOUNTAIN VIEW VOICE NEWSPAPER!!!
THEY ARE OUT OF TOUCH WITH WHAT IS RIGHT FOR MOUNTAIN VIEW!!!
THEY ARE THE ONES THAT IS PUSHING FOR CRAZY GROWTH IN THIS CITY.
WHAT OTHER CITY IN THE BAY AREA IS PLANNING GROWTH AT THIS SCALE?
Well, False, it seems that you wrong that people out here don’t care that both of these people lied to us to get elected. Rosenberg actually stood on my front porch and lied to my face. Neither one of them is trustworthy and I have no doubt that the best interests of the people of Mountain View will be second to what is politically expedient for these two.
We don’t need more housing. We have NO INFRASTRUCTURE to support all this new housing. We have a huge planning department that apparently does nothing because they don’t seem to think about services for all the building they are approving. Too bad what the people want doesn’t matter here.
But let’s not worry about the quality of life for the current residents of this city. Thank goodness these two will be able to wrangle even more housing to provide tax dollars for them to fritter away on nonsense. I’m SO happy they think my hard-earned dollars are Monopoly money for them to speculate with for their entertainment.
Palo Alto Post headline: “Flip Floppers become mayor and vice mayor”
I recall the words from the candidates were based on the information that they had at the time. As higher quality information was acquired, they changed their minds. That is why we elect/hire representatives. Not to stick to a decision based on politically-motivated NIMBY mis-information, but to continue gathering better and better knowledge and do what’s right for the community.
As to the allegations of corruption…if these candidates did not receive funding from the real estate group, who exactly would have been elected instead? From what I see, the election results would have been identical.
“I’m glad that we have a Mayor that is supporting the BRT project along El Camino. It’s important to have someone that represents the viewpoint of most of it’s residents and not just a vocal, mostly right-wing minority opinion. ”
What a lie. Like all the left-winge minority, nothing but lies!!
Do you actually think that the Palo Alto Daily Compost is worth taking seriously?
I do not follow what the Palo Alto Daily News paper does for me to call it the “compost” But I do follow and know what the Mountain View Voice newspaper does. When it comes to political issues, it has an agenda and it does not bring both sides of the story to it’s reader so they can make an informed decision themselves. It is an activist paper and it supports people who shares the papers position. Siegel is very out spoken that he is an activist, and I believe that Showalter and Rosenberg gave a wink to the Voice paper for their endorsement to city council. These 2 did not tell the truth to the public on key issues while running as candidates.
In 35 years of living in Mtn.View, we never had a council that was as unprofessional a group as this current council. Only one member has any business experience and two others are playing politics by dividing people up into groups and then attacking the ones that gives them the most political points. At no time can I remember any council member like Siegel who just hates businesses, people like him will always be here, but we should never elect them to any position that has any power.
The other council members need to grow a spine and do what’s right for All People and stop following Siegel.
The moral of this story is, whoever the Mountain View Voice endorses to the city council will be elected unless people wise up, do their own homework on the candidates and if they lie to us vote them out, I really favor a recall thou.
“At no time can I remember any council member like Siegel who just hates businesses, people like him will always be here, but we should never elect them to any position that has any power.”
Because you say so?
Reality check, Gladys: The Mountain View City Council has been the plaything of local businesses — particularly developers — for decades. If you think that’s fine and dandy, that’s your business; just know that there are a LOT of Mountain View residents who are fed up with that system.
If you don’t like that particular point of view, tough.
@Gladys, or whatever your real name is.
“Reality check, Gladys: The Mountain View City Council has been the plaything of local businesses — particularly developers — for decades. If you think that’s fine and dandy, that’s your business; just know that there are a LOT of Mountain View residents who are fed up with that system.”
If you don’t like that particular point of view, tough
Yes that is my point of view, and I feel sorry for you that you have such a child-est mindset that my point of view upsets you. I am sure you would like to ban people like me from stating my opinion.
Council member Siegel hates people who have work hard and have been successful in their business. He wants to punish them by limiting their income and or to have them pay more than their fair share. I am against anyone that is bought off by any group, and I am equally against people who wants to redistributing hard earned income from people who worked hard to get it.
P.S
Your first name would not be Jack by chance?
“Council member Siegel hates people who have work hard and have been successful in their business. He wants to punish them by limiting their income and or to have them pay more than their fair share. I am against anyone that is bought off by any group, and I am equally against people who wants to redistributing hard earned income from people who worked hard to get it.”
Boy, what a bunch of crazed word salad THAT is…
So tell me “Gladys” (if that is your actual name): Ever think of moving to Somalia? No pesky governmental regulations to worry about there…
Congratulations Pat! Your good sense and balanced way of talking is a welcome breath of fresh air to me. Housing is the critical #1 but also traffic issues are up there somewhere too. Best wishes.