Editorial: Health care proposal cruel and indefensible


The Republican Congress and the White House have certainly gotten themselves into a bind. For years congressional Republicans have fiercely criticized the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which is one of President Obama's key legacies. And on the campaign trail, Donald Trump and Republican congressional candidates vowed to "repeal and replace Obamacare," zeroing in on the program's shortcomings while ignoring its many virtues, including the fact that it enabled millions of previously uninsured Americans to have access to affordable health care.

Recent polls show that significantly more people favor the ACA over Republican bills introduced in both houses of Congress this year to replace the current health care law. But now, despite the public's growing opposition to the Republican plans -- which would leave 22 million more Americans without health insurance and many more struggling with higher medical costs -- Republicans are trying to figure out a way to make good on their campaign promises without backlash from their constituents.

But the situation is far more than a vexing dilemma for Washington politicos. It represents, for many Americans, a matter of life or death. The secretly crafted Senate plan recently revealed to the public and fellow members of Congress would, among other things, gut the Medicaid program serving the neediest Americans by slashing $772 billion from its budget, and allow states to determine whether people could be excluded from insurance coverage for pre-existing conditions.

The proposed bill would severely impact the young and the old, although working Americans and others in the middle of those age groups are likely see higher costs in medical care and preventive-care programs. Congresswoman Anna Eshoo, who represents portions of the Peninsula, noted that the proposed ACA replacement "provides less coverage to fewer Americans at higher costs." Her description of the bill as "heartless and cruel" is rightfully echoed across the country as details of this proposal emerge.

An article by Kevin Forestieri in the June 30 issue of the Voice touches on some of the adverse consequences of this bill in Santa Clara County. At Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, where 43 percent of the children receiving care are supported by Medi-Cal and the Children's Health Insurance Program, hits to the Medicaid/Medi-Cal program would dramatically impact a medical facility nationally recognized for its programs and, oftentimes, lifesaving services for the young.

The county-operated Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, where more than half of patient visits are funded by Medi-Cal/Medicaid, would be hard-hit by provisions in the Senate bill. County Supervisor Joe Simitian noted that people now covered by Medi-Cal "would be denied coverage or have insufficient coverage, and the responsibility for indigent care would again fall on the county -- presumably without the reimbursement and resources necessary."

There is strong resistance in California and across the nation to this travesty of a "health care" bill, which if passed would throw into reverse the country's progress in addressing serious problems with health care access for all Americans. We applaud Rep. Eshoo and state senators Kamala Harris and Dianne Feinstein for adding their forceful voices to the opposition.

The ACA has flaws, but they are fixable flaws. Whether congressional Republicans will get that message and change course remains to be seen, but they risk serious consequences in the 2018 election if they move forward with their current cruel plan.

What is democracy worth to you?
Support local journalism.


3 people like this
Posted by Concerned
a resident of Another Mountain View Neighborhood
on Jul 11, 2017 at 4:46 pm

This comment is scary

"and allow states to determine whether people could be excluded from insurance coverage for pre-existing conditions"

This would give California and other states more control over our lives than they already have!

3 people like this
Posted by chris
a resident of another community
on Jul 14, 2017 at 9:38 pm

Do you realize that was the standard just a few years ago, pre-ACA?

3 people like this
Posted by Observer
a resident of Another Mountain View Neighborhood
on Jul 15, 2017 at 5:30 am

"Do you realize that was the standard just a few years ago, pre-ACA?"

Yes, and the nation saw how much better it became with ACA. If the new bill turns out worse than ACA for the American people, Obama wins and the left has long bragging rights over healthcare. I think the R's know this an are torn between supporting their large donators from the insurance lobby and putting something beneficial together for average Americans. Ironically, the red-est states will have the most citizens negatively affected by the plans that bow deeply to the Insurance Lobby. That's why it became so complicated for them.

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

All your news. All in one place. Every day.

Chick-fil-A quietly starts delivering out of DoorDash kitchen in Redwood City
By Elena Kadvany | 28 comments | 3,448 views

Disposing of Disposables
By Sherry Listgarten | 24 comments | 3,052 views

Differentiating Grief from Clinical Depression
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,104 views