News

Driver identified in fiery Tesla crash

NTSB sending investigators to review response to the crash

A driver who died in a fiery car crash on Highway 101 has been identified by the Santa Clara County medical examiner's office.

San Mateo resident Wei Huang, 38, died of his injuries on Friday afternoon after his Tesla collided with a median at freeway speeds, triggering a three-vehicle accident and causing the car to catch fire.

The crash occurred around 9:30 a.m., when the Tesla struck the barrier separating the Highway 85 carpool flyover lane from southbound Highway 101, according to California Highway Patrol officials. The Tesla careened into two lanes of Highway 101, where it was struck by a Mazda and then an Audi. Huang was transported to Stanford Hospital, where he died of his injuries.

Emergency fire crews arrived at the crash shortly after 9:30 a.m., and found that the front end of the Tesla had "substantial damage," exposing the vehicle's lithium ion battery and causing it to catch fire, according to Mountain View Fire Chief Juan Diaz. Electric vehicle fires are typically put out by blasting a large quantity of water -- 3,000 gallons -- directly on the battery to bring down the temperature of the cells, which can overheat and reach temperatures of up to 900 degrees, he said.

Diaz said the department was put in a difficult situation. Fire crews had 500 gallons of water at the scene, but getting any more would have required running 2,000 feet of thick fire hose across Highway 101, which would have been catastrophic for traffic in both directions, Diaz said. But letting the car continue to burn on a busy highway, destroying the battery, would have been a bad choice as well, he said.

"In the middle of the Highway 101 freeway, that's not something we want to do," he said. "And it's not good for the environment with the byproducts of combustion."

Fire crews used the available supply of water and contacted the manufacturer of the vehicle, Palo Alto-based Tesla, to assist in getting the battery's temperature under control. Diaz said the engineers essentially disassembled a portion of the car battery on the spot, and that subsequent thermal imaging showed that the battery was no longer unstable.

Fire engines escorted the tow truck that removed the Tesla all the way to the impound yard out of an abundance of caution, Diaz said. Car batteries are capable of reigniting for 24 hours after cooling.

The challenging situation was made worse by the significant damage caused by collision itself. Diaz said that Tesla vehicles are built to be very safe, with features to help first responders deal with lithium ion batteries that ignite, but in this case emergency crews had no access to the battery's disconnect wires because they were destroyed on impact. This is the first time the department has dealt with this kind of problem, Diaz said, and he commended his department's response to the dangerous situation.

"I'm frankly very proud of how the Mountain View fire fighters handled the event," he said.

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) announced over social media Tuesday morning, March 27, that the agency is investigating the fatal crash and the emergency response from the fire department. It's unclear at this point, according to the 8:15 a.m. tweet, whether the Telsa's automated control system aboard the vehicle was active at the time of the crash.

NTSB spokesman Christopher O'Neil told the Voice that one of the two investigators of the incident is already in Mountain View to conduct what the agency calls a "field investigation" of the crash, which is narrow in scope and examines specific safety issues rather than an all-encompassing accident investigation.

"It's going to focus on the post-crash fire that resulted in this accident, and steps that were taken and necessary to make the vehicle safe for removal from the scene," O'Neil said.

Investigative teams typically spend about five to 10 days working at the scene of the crash, depending on the complexity of the incident, before starting work on publishing the results. O'Neil said the investigation may or may not lead to a preliminary report a few weeks after reviewing the accident, and it's possible the accident report will be rolled into a larger investigative review of similar accidents.

O'Neil said reports on car batteries and the appropriate response to incidents like the accident on Friday are important, given that electric cars are increasingly common on roadways and emergency responders need a good strategy to render the vehicles safe. He said the report is not aimed at affixing blame or liability on the fire department or any of the involved parties, instead taking a close look at what could be done to help save lives and mitigate the effects of the accident.

"The report looks at whether there's something that could be done or should be done," he said. "It's not that we think there's a problem, it's that we want to explore that issue."

Tesla representatives could not be reached for comment.

Bay City News Service contributed to this report

Comments

4 people like this
Posted by Jim
a resident of Slater
on Mar 26, 2018 at 11:04 am

Did he hit the barrier between the flyover lane to 85 and the carpool lane that continues on 101? There used to be large yellow barrels there to help cushion a crash. What happened to those?


6 people like this
Posted by Resident
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Mar 26, 2018 at 11:12 am

He obliterated the crash barrier. It was one of those steel barriers that's designed to collapse and absorb crash energy. It's no longer there, and it looks like crews are setting up to build a new one this morning.


6 people like this
Posted by Resident2
a resident of Another Mountain View Neighborhood
on Mar 26, 2018 at 11:26 am

The crash barrier was not reset for this crash. He effectively hit the concrete barrier with no crash attenuator to soften the blow.


3 people like this
Posted by sheik y.
a resident of Stierlin Estates
on Mar 26, 2018 at 11:52 am

[Post removed due to disrespectful comment or offensive language]


9 people like this
Posted by David K
a resident of North Whisman
on Mar 26, 2018 at 2:49 pm

David K is a registered user.

Many thanks to the MVFD!


10 people like this
Posted by Sylvan Park Resident
a resident of Sylvan Park
on Mar 26, 2018 at 3:33 pm

Sylvan Park Resident is a registered user.

Terrible crash, this photo shows the front end of Tesla entirely disintegrated Web Link

Condolences to the driver's family,and many thanks to the anonymous Good Samaritan who stopped to help him. He said "I rounded towards what used to be the front of the car and saw, remarkably, an intact man that was covered in a light layer of dust. The front of the car was simply gone."


6 people like this
Posted by Juan
a resident of Rengstorff Park
on Mar 26, 2018 at 8:03 pm

Juan is a registered user.

How is it legal to drive this car on public roadways? Tesla has a lot of explaining to do.


19 people like this
Posted by Justathought
a resident of Sylvan Park
on Mar 26, 2018 at 9:38 pm

Justathought is a registered user.

Seriously? How is it legal to drive this car? Seriously? Condolences to his family first off. This car hit a median abutment at probably 70+ miles an hour. Barrier absorbing items in place or not, it probably didn’t matter. Actually, if anything the metal style has been known to pierce through a car in certain conditions rather than crumple as designed. Bottom line is nothing will guarantee your safety in a headon collision with an abutment at that speed. The simple fact that there was an intact body to extract is a COMPLIMENT or TESTAMENT to how safe the Tesla Model S truly is. Most cars would have been destroyed beyond recognition. They have very good technologies in place to control the batteries in a serious crash. THIS WAS TOO ETREME to ever design for. No car is designed to protect you and not catch fire or have the gas tank actually explode from this EXTREME of a collision. Kudos to MVFD and the Tesla engineers that prevented a larger catastrophe......again condolences to his family.


3 people like this
Posted by Justathought
a resident of Sylvan Park
on Mar 26, 2018 at 11:09 pm

Justathought is a registered user.

A quick follow up on my part.........it appears that this may have been the model X instead of a model S. I have seen conflicting reports. For whatever that is worth......


9 people like this
Posted by @Juan
a resident of Gemello
on Mar 27, 2018 at 2:34 pm

@Juan is a registered user.

@Juan....dude. The car you drive literally holds flammable material that you continue to inject into the tank every time it gets low. How is it legal to drive such a vehicle on public roadways?

Indeed.


5 people like this
Posted by Cleave Frink
a resident of Willowgate
on Mar 27, 2018 at 9:15 pm

Cleave Frink is a registered user.

All I could think about when I passed by was the incomplete life left behind at the scene. I was saddened all day.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


To post your comment, please login or register at the top of the page. This topic is only for those who have signed up to participate by providing their email address and establishing a screen name.

Fine-dining Korean restaurant to open in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 16 comments | 5,688 views

Couples: “True love is a decision between the head and the heart . . .
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 992 views

U-Pick at Webb Ranch
By Laura Stec | 0 comments | 962 views