SVCF facing calls for new leadership

CEO of $13 billion Silicon Valley Community Foundation placed on leave, accused of allowing 'toxic' culture

The Silicon Valley Community Foundation is reeling from a crisis of leadership following allegations last week that the organization had allowed a toxic workplace culture to fester for years.

Last week, more than a dozen former employees of the Mountain View-based nonprofit went public with complaints against Mari Ellen Reynolds Loijens, the foundation's No. 2 executive and star fundraiser, alleging that she was an abusive manager who frequently berated her subordinates and made sexually inappropriate remarks.

Loijens tendered her resignation late last week; however, the influential nonprofit is still facing criticism that its top leadership had essentially condoned her behavior for years. Many current and former employees are calling for CEO Emmett D. Carson to step down, saying he was complicit in the oppressive workplace.

On Thursday morning, April 26, the SVCF board of directors announced they were placing Carson on paid administrative leave while they investigate the charges. The action came roughly one week after allegations of abuse first surfaced.

"Emmett Carson needs to go, they have to bring in a new CEO with a different style of management," said Sarah Lorraine Goodman, the nonprofit's former digital marketing lead. "The longer he stays, the more damage it'll do to SVCF as a brand."

The foundation wields a great deal of clout. SVCF's 150-person staff is headquartered in a Latham Street office building, but its role is global. Considered the largest organization of its kind, the community foundation has grown to be a vital funding source for hundreds of nonprofits, NGOs and other organizations. In roughly a decade, SVCF has seen meteoric growth, most recently reporting more than $13 billion in assets, much of it coming from donors from the tech sector.

Goodman joined SVCF in March of 2014 with the task of redesigning the organization's social media strategy, a job that put her a couple levels beneath Loijens. From her first day, she got the distinct impression that Loijens didn't like her. Drafts of her work proposals came back from Loijens' desk covered in disparaging comments, like "this is a waste of my time." Loijens never seemed to hold back in giving her a verbal dressing-down, almost always doing it publicly, to maximize the embarrassment, Goodman said.

Goodman remembers the big day, after a few months on the job, when she was supposed to present her marketing plan to some of the foundation's executives. She didn't get through the first presentation slide before Loijens cut her off and called it a failure. She then berated Goodman for botching simple instructions.

Other directors at the meeting rose to Goodman's defense, saying she had explicitly followed Loijens' own directions, she said. They even pointed to her own emails as proof.

In the end, it didn't matter. Loijens was undeterred and her harassment continued, Goodman said. That's when it was clear that her days were numbered at SVCF. Soon after, she was meeting weekly with human resources staff to figure out some way to continue her job, Goodman said. It was abundantly clear that staying at the nonprofit meant she was the one who was supposed to adjust to Loijens' behavior.

"One HR person told me: 'You need to realize that Mari Ellen isn't going anywhere; she's staying here. Either you figure out how to work with her, or you have to leave," she said.

After nine months, Goodman was asked to resign. HR workers advised her to tell her co-workers she was going back to graduate school, rather than being terminated.

Goodman met with Carson for an exit interview, and she laid out all her troubles with Loijens' bullying. Before shaking her hand, Carson told her he would look into it.

Four years later, following an expose about Loijens in the Chronicle of Philanthropy, Carson and SVCF are in damage control mode as more stories of workplace abuse have emerged. On his Twitter feed, Carson emphasized a zero-tolerance policy toward inappropriate conduct, and he pledged to take "whatever actions are necessary" to move forward.

Carson and SVCF did not respond to questions submitted by the Voice. Loijens also did not respond to calls seeking comment.

As the allegations surfaced last week, Foundation officials announced that an independent law firm would be retained to investigate employees' concerns.

Privately, in a letter to the SVCF donors, Carson disputed some aspects of the complaints, saying they were focused on selective information. Most employees were content, he said, pointing to surveys showing that 85 percent of the SVCF staff felt respected by their supervisors. In 2017, the staff turnover rate was 26 percent, higher than average, he admitted.

"The allegations are serious and of great concern to me," he wrote. "We will continue to focus on improving our workplace and building the culture so we continue to make a positive impact in our communities."

Multiple employees told the Voice that annual turnover for Loijens' department was actually as high as 40 percent. They also disputed the survey statistics that Carson cited, pointing out he declined to mention that the same report showed only 33 percent of staffers felt they could give honest feedback without consequences.

The new revelations of staff disapproval have apparently sparked some concern that donors could revolt. On Monday, Los Altos Hills entrepreneur Steve Kirsch wrote an open letter in the San Jose Mercury News expressing disbelief that workplace abuse had continued for 11 years with no knowledge by top leaders. He threatened to take his future donations elsewhere unless the "failure of leadership" was corrected.

After a Monday board meeting, the nonprofit announced it was widening its investigation into the workplace abuse by hiring a second law firm to assist.

On Wednesday, April 25, an anonymous letter claiming to be from 65 current SVCF employees was sent to the nonprofit's board. The letter called for Carson and Vice President Daiva Natochy to be immediately suspended, and for the investigation to be expanded to include their role in the alleged abuse. Soon afterward, the board received a second letter signed by 25 former employees calling for Carson's immediate termination.

In a meeting Thursday, April 26, the foundation's 18-member board of directors voted to place Carson on paid administrative leave until the investigation is completed. A former board member, Greg Avis, was appointed interim CEO.

Several former SVCF staffers told the Voice that they didn't find Carson to be credible, saying he seemed to allow Loijens' dysfunctional behavior as long as she continued to attract substantial donors.

Internally at the foundation, around 2013 Loijens was reportedly credited for landing two colossal donations of Facebook stock from Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan. Today, those stock donations are valued at about $5.76 billion. In 2014, she also reportedly took credit for a $500 million contribution from GoPro founder Nick Woodman.

With those immense deals attached to her name, Loijens seemed practically "untouchable" at the organization, Goodman said.

"Everybody was flabbergasted and amazed that she could score this huge fish," Goodman said. "As long as she was able to bring in that level of money, it was clear that Emmett Carson was never going to get rid of her."

But would those donations have come in without Loijens? Some former co-workers believe Loijens' golden touch was a myth. As more tech companies began going public after the mid-2000s, there was a flood of newly-minted tycoons looking to do something with their windfall.

SVCF's predecessor, the Community Foundation Silicon Valley, made it a practice to tailor its donor outreach for tech leaders, especially those who would be interested in a large tax write-off for a charitable cause. Many donors came forward without much coaxing, said Sue Covey, who served as Community Foundation Silicon Valley director of planned giving.

"The big gifts that came into the organization had nothing to do with Loijens, but because of her position, she got the credit for it," Covey said. "She took credit for everything that came in, even though a lot of it didn't initiate with her."

Loijens joined the Community Foundation in 2004, making her Covey's direct superior. Even back then, she showed similar behavior to what is described in the new allegations, Covey said. To donors and her superiors, Loijens could turn on the charm, but to anyone in a subordinate position, she held them "completely in disdain," she said. Other described her erratic behavior as like Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.

Covey resigned in 2005, a decision she attributes "100 percent" to Loijens' behavior. Like other former employees who were interviewed, Covey said she began warning others in the nonprofit field against working with Loijens or SVCF.

A difficult merger

In 2006, talks began for a merger between the San Jose-based Community Foundation Silicon Valley and the San Mateo Peninsula Community Foundation, a deal promoted as a way to expand philanthropic reach and donor base. Carson was picked to head the newly formed Silicon Valley Community Foundation, and even before the merger was finalized he selected Loijens as his No. 2, naming her his chief of staff. Some employees believe Carson found Loijens to be useful as an enforcer, the bad cop to his good cop.

It was a difficult transition, said Patti Pace, SVCF's former corporate philanthropy manager. All the staff were stripped of their titles and had to reapply for their jobs. Many senior professionals were ousted and replaced with younger rookies.

Pace recalls an all-staff meeting at the Mountain View office that Carson called around 2007 to address the early complaints being leveled at Loijens. It was an uncomfortable meeting, and Carson signaled that Loijens was operating with his full support. Pace will never forget what he told the staff: "When Mari Ellen speaks, I speak."

Former employees who had worked under Loijens, going back more than a decade, say that her bullying was an open secret among nonprofit professionals, but no one wanted to speak out because it seemed like career suicide.

"It was obvious she was abusing her power, but then everyone knew that you do not complain about Mari Ellen," Pace said. "What resulted is the SVCF lost a lot of really forward-thinking, innovative people who could have made major contributions."

At least one complaint did reverberate outside of SVCF's walls. In 2014, Loijens' former executive assistant Rui Zhou filed a lawsuit alleging she was unfairly terminated.

In her allegations, Zhou said she had years of "glowing" performance reviews from Loijens up until she went on maternity leave. Two days after returning to work, she immediately received her first negative evaluation from Loijens. Two more bad reviews followed, each giving little explanation for the poor marks except for Zhou's "calendar management" skills, according to court records.

SVCF later settled the lawsuit for an undisclosed sum. Zhou and her attorney did not respond to requests for comment.

Just weeks before the lawsuit, a complaint was made to the Department of Fair Employment and Housing, alleging Loijens had a pattern of discrimination against female employees who became mothers, and she had forced them out of their jobs.

Pace and other former employees say there were at least two other lawsuits against Loijens for harassment, but these cases could not be located in the Santa Clara County Court records system. Past records are available only three years back at the state Fair Employment and Housing Department.

Loijens' division, the development department, reportedly became like a revolving door as people quickly burned out after working with her. Pace remembers a young administrator being brought to tears on her first day of work after being rebuked by Loijens.

Internally, much of the staff made it a practice to try and avoid Loijens' attention. A code word, "muskrat" was used to signal when she was verging on sexually inappropriate comments, according to a source who declined to be named. The development director position became particularly notorious, and new hires would routinely resign after less than a year in the job.

One recruiter told Pace that he could only hire people from out of town who didn't know Loijens. Over the years, the nonprofit's Glassdoor review page filled with warnings to job seekers that SVCF wasn't worth the hardship.

Several employees who were interviewed for this story say they suffered health and mental issues as a result of their experience at SVCF. Goodman, who worked only nine months at the nonprofit, says she needed therapy and couldn't work for more than two years afterward. One former SVCF employee described having post-traumatic stress disorder for years after she left.

"It was a very toxic environment and the worst employment situation I've ever had in my career," she said. The former employee declined to be named because she said she had signed a non-disparagement agreement.

In the coming days, the law firms heading the investigation will set up an anonymous reporting system available to anyone not currently employed at SVCF.

Editor's note: Bill Johnson, CEO and President of Embarcadero Media, which publishes the Voice, served on the Silicon Valley Community Foundation Board of Directors from 2004 to 2011.

What is democracy worth to you?
Support local journalism.


36 people like this
Posted by Distirct Office Staff
a resident of Another Mountain View Neighborhood
on Apr 26, 2018 at 1:51 pm

People shouldn't be so shocked. The same goes for Superintendent Rudolph and his second-in-command Ghysels at Mountain View Whisman School District. The EXACT same thing as been going on. Amazing they both still have jobs. The Board is clueless like in this situation.

22 people like this
Posted by svcf alumni
a resident of North Whisman
on Apr 26, 2018 at 4:18 pm

Very proud of current and former staff for bringing this further to the board! We were drawn to SVCF with big dreams of changing the world at the 'nation's largest community foundation' only to face what has come to light now. For a foundation so set on impacting the local and global community, it sure did not care for it's OWN internal community (see Glassdoor reviews-all are 100% accurate). For Emmett to deny these allegations is also laughable but not surprising. He can enjoy his 'paid leave' considering his annual salary runs at nearly $900,000.

15 people like this
Posted by Monty
a resident of Castro City
on Apr 26, 2018 at 5:07 pm

I don't even work in that sector but I have heard from multiple people for years that it's a bad place. The CEO must have known.

9 people like this
Posted by former non-profit director
a resident of Another Mountain View Neighborhood
on Apr 27, 2018 at 10:51 am

it is very hard for California incorporated non-profit directors to 'git their head around' the legal fact they have been granted, by CA Corporations Code, the absolute right to inspect all documents of the corporation. There are very very few restrictions to this director's oversight right/responsibility. (can't delve into employees medical leave records, personnel data like home addresses, spouse/legal-parner names).

But # of complaints (formal) received by the HR department, # of informal email complaints received by the HR department, text of the complaints received (maybe redacted by the complainers name), exit interviews?

All that is fair game - and what a responsible non-profit direct needs to 'troll', on their own, with their own State Law derived oversight power. Never defer to the CEO. Never. And this is not a Board-voted power, it is individual.

The Business Man, can you quote the Code for us, or further explain?

12 people like this
Posted by Common sense
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Apr 27, 2018 at 10:58 am

Common sense is a registered user.

Behaviors like those described here are far more common in silicon valley, including or especially its commercial firms, than outsiders realize (including people IN silicon valley but outside the afflicted organizations). I've experienced it first-hand, and seen and heard of many other cases. The polished, smooth-talking new hire into a key hands-on managment role, who seems to know everyone in the field, and sets those higher in the organization brimming with confidence. Then takes credit for results he or she had nothing to do with (or actively obstructed); loses all respect from subordinates, and so substitutes sheer position power and personal bullying; in time, drives away all of the real talent; then, once let go (for these people are inevitably let go, usually much too late, if only because the outfit they were hired to lead was wrecked), they boast in their next job interviews (or on an employment résumé -- I've seen this too) how they led their former organization to glory, or even "turned it around" (a literal quote).

Whether these behaviors stem from Narcissistic Personality Disorder, from the haunting insecurity of someone who knows they're incompetent but is politically shrewd, or from the type of pathological liar who makes up claims freely and then proceeds to believe them -- the overall result is the same: a workplace "bad apple" whose destructive effects on the organization extend vastly beyond just the waste of salary paid to the person. The other common denominator: acquiescence or enabling by senior management, because for a problem employee to drive away many good people takes time, and shows signs along the way. So these episodes always say as much about the organization's management culture as about the one bad-news individual.

It'd be an epic general topic for a writer or documentary filmmaker who wanted to look at silicon valley for real (beyond the customary gee-whiz pop-culture superficialities), but I don't know if that's truly possible, because doing it justice would require the unique insight of direct, visceral employee experience with these situations.

10 people like this
Posted by RetiredSVguy
a resident of another community
on Apr 28, 2018 at 4:32 pm

RetiredSVguy is a registered user.

I have close friend who used to work SVCF and had heard about Loijens. I have also met Carson and heard him speak. He is a charismatic speaker, and appears to have progressive beliefs on a variety of areas in terms of making life better for those disadvantaged. However, it seems clear that he has little regard for his employees or having a positive work culture. Loijens was a cancer. I really never have understood why those in power feel the need to step on the very people that do the hard work everyday. Loijens is either a sociopath (has no empathy), and/or a narcissist that is inherently insecure. This is nothing new, I guess, but the sad thing is that there used to be a more beneficial way of doing business and treating employees with respect. Hewlett and Packard apparently had it right. This kind of disdain and mistreatment is all to prevalent now, and seems to be growing. What no one seems to talk about with SVCF, is that not only did Carson look the other way, but I have to believe that some of the board members did too. Hard to believe that no board member had ever heard or known about this. That no one talked to or sent a message to board members in all these years. But I guess when you grow an organization from $2billion to $13billion in a few years, people can look the other way.

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Couple brings Chinese zongzi to Mountain View
By Elena Kadvany | 1 comment | 6,150 views

Don't Miss Your Exit (and other lessons from an EV drive)
By Sherry Listgarten | 12 comments | 1,928 views

Goodbye Food Waste!
By Laura Stec | 5 comments | 1,714 views

"Better" Dads and "Re-invigorated" Moms: Happier Couples
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,268 views


Register today!

On Friday, October 11, join us at the Palo Alto Baylands for a 5K walk, 5K run, 10K run or half marathon! All proceeds benefit local nonprofits serving children and families.

Learn More