Task force weighs relocating junior high to Mountain View | News | Mountain View Online |


Task force weighs relocating junior high to Mountain View

Moving LASD's Egan would solve some problems, but could be controversial

Amid intense debate over what kind of school Los Altos School District should plant in Mountain View's San Antonio neighborhood, a group of task force members is now considering relocating Egan Junior High School to the area in order to make room for Bullis Charter School to grow.

Last month, the district convened a Site Advisory Task Force made up of residents and district employees to hammer out recommendations on the new school campus. The school district is forging ahead on its strategy of buying land in the San Antonio shopping center, but needs to figure out what kind of school to put there.

Margaret Abe-Koga
The school district could move Bullis, the region's popular charter school, to Mountain View or it could create a new neighborhood school designated for Mountain View residents living in the district. Task force members, as of May 30, appeared split between the two ideas, with a bare majority favoring moving the charter school in a straw vote.

But in the latest development in a long, controversial debate over future school plans, task force member and Mountain View City Councilwoman Margaret Abe-Koga suggested a third option -- moving Egan Junior High School to Mountain View. She said it could be a solid way to avoid controversy and disruption to the school community while benefiting San Antonio neighborhood residents with open space, a track, a gym and other facilities.

Bullis Charter School is currently housed in portables split between two campuses, Egan and Blach Intermediate School, and vacating the existing Egan campus could give the charter school much-needed space to grow and potentially consolidate on a single campus, Abe-Koga argued. It wouldn't necessitate any boundary changes because no new school would be created, and nearby residents would benefit from the broad range of amenities that come with a junior high school.

Egan, currently located along West Portola Avenue in Los Altos, is about one mile away from the 9.65-acre site Los Altos School District officials are considering for a new school.

Up until the May 30 meeting, the only two serious options under consideration were moving Bullis or creating a new neighborhood school, triggering some task force members to take a hesitant approach to this new, un-vetted idea of relocating Egan until district staff could pull together more information on costs and potential impacts.

Some task force members raised concerns that moving Egan would do nothing to address the growing number of students living in the Mountain View region of the district north of El Camino Real, while others warned of serious backlash from the local community if it lost a neighborhood school.

Task force member Tom McGovern, appearing to reject the idea outright, said Los Altos residents would sharply oppose the idea, while Assistant Superintendent Sandra McGonagle said staff, kids, former students and the community would feel like a big part of the community was lost if the district uprooted the school and moved it.

"This is the Egan I have known for 50 or 60 years," she said. "I don't think it's as simple as moving it down the road."

Abe-Koga challenged the idea that moving a junior high school, which houses students through brief two-year stints, is somehow a big disruption or a loss of historic value. She said that her children are going to attend Graham Middle School for three years, and there won't be some kind of long-standing attachment to the school once they leave.

"It's a two-year school and once your kids move out, you move on," she said. "I think the history is shorter, to me, and you can transition much more quickly."

Task force member James Reilly, a Crossings resident, said there were simply too many unknowns for him to back Abe-Koga's idea. The idea of moving Bullis students out of portables and into Egan's old buildings could be convenient, but he worried that it would come with necessary upgrades and modifications that could cost millions. It could run the risk of eating up the entirety of the district's $150 million bond.

"Conceptually, there is appeal here," he said. "But if you have to get rid of all the portables and spend $50 million on old Egan and $75 million on new Egan, then I think it doesn't work."

Council weighs in

Sending a strong signal to the task force Tuesday night, Mountain View City Council members voted 5-1 to formally urge the district to consider moving Egan to the Mountain View site, and doubled down on the council's preference for a neighborhood elementary school that would serve local residents in the San Antonio area.

Councilwoman Pat Showalter said a school for Mountain View students would be an important "focal point" for building a community in the area, which has been ripe with new residential development in recent years. Despite the growth, the area doesn't have a nearby public school and has a dismal 1.34 acres of park space per 1,000 residents.

"It really is park-poor and it doesn't have a school, and it clearly needs those two things," she said.

The June 12 vote doesn't change much, given that council members already made the neighborhood school preference clear to Los Altos School District officials back in January. At the time, the City Council agreed to provide financial support and incentives to make it feasible for the district to buy land for a school in the region, but stopped short of demanding a neighborhood school as a condition.

Mayor Lenny Siegel said he would prefer a neighborhood school, but said the city shouldn't use the cross-agency cooperation as leverage for a specific outcome. Councilman John McAlister, the sole dissenting vote Tuesday night, said the council shouldn't tell the district what to do with a new school site, and reiterated that council members lack the expertise to make that kind of decision.

Among the arguments against a neighborhood school, some task force members expressed concerns that it would concentrate too many of the school district's low-income and English-language learner students all on one campus. Currently, they are dispersed among Santa Rita, Almond and Covington elementary schools. Task force members have argued that splitting Mountain View students up could have a positive effect on academic performance for all district students, and that all three schools would lose valuable diversity if a neighborhood school is built in Mountain View.

Siegel said he wasn't sold on the argument, and that Mountain View kids shouldn't be forced to travel south into Los Altos as a means to balance out diversity for wealthier communities.

"In the absence of discriminatory policies -- deliberate racial segregation -- what you end up with is the poor kids always being the ones to travel the most ... because you have to split them up to integrate Los Altos Hills," he said. "That seems counter-productive in terms of social justice issues."

No easy solution

What became clear during the May 30 meeting is that none of the three options solved all of the district's problems, and were unlikely to quell long-standing feuds between the district and Bullis Charter School.

Creating an elementary school for Mountain View residents would be a relief valve for growing enrollment across the district, but wouldn't do much to solve the charter school's ongoing need for classrooms, blacktop and field space. Moving Bullis to Mountain View would vacate space on the district's two junior high schools and could pave the way for a long-awaited conversion to a three-year middle-school model, but kids north of El Camino Real would still be fragmented across multiple schools and would have to venture south into Los Altos past major roads to get to school.

Perhaps the most complicating facet of the debate is that Bullis officials want to expand the charter school from 900 to 1,200 students. Jill Jene, the charter school's representative on the task force, said there's no way all of those students are going to fit on a Mountain View site she described as a small "postage stamp" north of El Camino, conflicting with the expectation that moving Bullis would create a single campus for the charter school.

Bullis growing by more than 30 percent wasn't among the built-in assumptions going into the task force process, which assumed the Mountain View school would be for a 600-student neighborhood school or a 900-student charter school. But Jene said that was made in error -- Bullis officials have been keeping enrollment down in keeping with a five-year agreement with the district that's due to expire, and its growth plans have been made abundantly clear to the district.

In past years, the Los Altos School District and Bullis Charter School have fought lengthy legal battles over facilities agreements and interpretations of the state's charter school law, Proposition 39, which states that the school district must provide "reasonably equivalent" facilities. Both parties brokered a five-year agreement in 2014, effectively ending all litigation, but it's unclear whether the cease-fire will continue when the agreement expires next year.

Task force member Joe Seither said his hope was that creating a campus with brand-new facilities, to the tune of $75 million, would go a long way toward easing the longstanding tensions between the district and the charter school. To grow beyond that school's capacity, he said, is a voluntary choice by Bullis to exceed the facilities they are given.

Nearing the end of the meeting, Jene expressed frustration that the task force was painting itself into a corner with an ever-increasing list of constraints to try to appease everyone. She said they couldn't consider building a school on existing land -- buying property in Mountain View was an assumption -- but task force members were also pushing against redrawing boundaries, moving schools or displacing students. School districts do these things all the time in order to adjust to changes in enrollment, she said.

Abe-Koga, in defending her idea of moving Egan, said that something has to give if the task force wants to reach a recommendation.

"You're going to have to let go," she said. "Everyone has to make a compromise."

What is democracy worth to you?
Support local journalism.


18 people like this
Posted by Margaret Makes Sense
a resident of Gemello
on Jun 18, 2018 at 11:53 am

It is nice to see that the MV Council representative on this LASD task force is making a Lot Of Sense, by making suggestions in a years-long controversy between MV students families, BCS families, and die-hard keep-the-status-quo LASD families.

New thinking is obviously what is needed in the BCS/LASD new school facilities problem. Margret is doing a great job bring up NEW THINKING! LASD staff? " Assistant Superintendent Sandra McGonagle said staff, kids, former students and the community would feel like a big part of the community was lost if the district uprooted the school and moved it."This is the Egan I have known for 50 or 60 years," she said. "I don't think it's as simple as moving it down the road."

Half-century old thinking, by nostalgic LASD staff members, seems to be partially what resulted in the BCS "wars". Time for her and Tom McGovern ("rejected idea outright") to rethink how history develops and 'moves on". Hillsdale LASD campus? It's glad the LA City Council instructed LASD to "move one people" from that half-century old facilities idea also.

2 people like this
Posted by past student
a resident of another community
on Jun 18, 2018 at 2:25 pm

I grew up in Los Altos in the Mt. View School District... I was wondering when the name changed from Egan to Eagan...just a misprint, I guess

2 people like this
Posted by Neighbor
a resident of Monta Loma
on Jun 18, 2018 at 2:37 pm

"She said it could be a solid way to avoid controversy and disruption to the school community while benefiting San Antonio neighborhood residents with open space, a track, a gym and other facilities."

And exactly when is any middle school campus open to the public? This sounds unrealistic in terms of benefit and possibly unsafe, especially considering the proximity to the new Village at San Antonio. Will this school have have enough parking and a designated drop off zone, in order to not disturb traffic?

Like this comment
Posted by Shane
a resident of The Crossings
on Jun 18, 2018 at 2:59 pm

I assume this is still talking about the site including the old Safeway and the Old Mill Office Center.

This site should be redeveloped as a pedestrian thoroughfare between the Caltrain station and the rest of The Village. Park space and transit-oriented developments are what should be here, not a school. The area needs a school, but this simply is not a good place to put it.

14 people like this
Posted by frisbee
a resident of Sylvan Park
on Jun 18, 2018 at 3:05 pm

frisbee is a registered user.

Both of our boys went through Egan and don't feel any attachment to it at all; they do have feelings for LAHS but Egan was too short and too long ago. I agree that all options should be on the table, but even so, I don't like the idea of that valuable new land going to Egan or Bullis...seems like it should be a neighborhood elementary school. I understand the diversity issue but being forced to travel across dangerous El Camino for school stinks, especially for little ones. The school should be close so they can walk or ride to school.

18 people like this
Posted by Egan Viking
a resident of another community
on Jun 18, 2018 at 5:21 pm

I am a proud Egan Junior High graduate and still reside in the area


Please stop with the SILLINESS!

Like this comment
Posted by Margaret Makes Sense
a resident of Gemello
on Jun 18, 2018 at 5:41 pm

that spelling/wording should have been
Hillview Ave. LASD campus? It's good the LA City Council instructed LASD to 'move on people' from that half-century old facilities idea also.

2 people like this
Posted by psr
a resident of The Crossings
on Jun 19, 2018 at 11:02 am

Abe-Koga talks about "compromise" as far as handing over the Egan campus to Bullis Charter. I am confused by her use of that word.

A compromise consists of two parties giving up something they want in order to reach an agreement that they both can live with going forward. LASD would be handing over a neighborhood school. What, exactly, would Bullis be giving up in this "compromise"? MS. Abe-Koga should point that out because it appear that Bullis gets exactly what they have always wanted (an existing LASD campus ) while giving nothing in return.

If they were willing to give up their right to sue LASD in perpetuity, that might be worth it. Other than that, this so-called compromise is a bad deal for LASD, a bad deal for the kids who attend Egan and a bonanza for BUllis. What it certainly is NOT is a compromise.

10 people like this
Posted by The Compromise
a resident of another community
on Jun 19, 2018 at 11:36 am

First, James Reilly is wrong. The presumption is that a school district would use existing facilities to house a charter school. There is no requirement to build new ones. Proper maintenance is required, but capital maintenance is the same regardless of how the district uses the buildings. It wouldn't cost millions to house BCS in the existing Egan buildings. They're better than where BCS is now, in portable buildings that are not well laid out on a proper amount of land. But they're not perfect, not even for their current usages. The district doesn't have to fix that to use them for the Charter school.

The thing is the district keeps claiming that it is cheaper to build new buildings than to renovate existing campuses. It's hard to argue with that, but it's true they are proposing to build a brand new 81,000 square feet building complex on the new land and use it for the charter school. I think BCS worries that their budget for this is inadequate and they won't really get 81,000 square feet of usable space that functions properly. LASD hasn't shown the best ability to manage construction or plan for land purchases, for example.

OK, so that's the compromise. Egan is 65,000 square feet of a known quantity, but run down and aged. The charter school deserves 80,000 square feet or more of space, but they could use some existing portables to round out what's available in the Egan complex itself now. Portable buildings are much cheaper than new construction, especially if they are already installed.

So the compromise is that the district would be motivated to do a good job on a new Egan complex whereas they could care less about the quality of a building destined for BCS. So Egan would get a brand new specially designed site near to where it is and really close to the homes of 250 or so of its students from Mountain View.

If you look at those traveling the longest to reach Egan, these are kids from Blach Jr High who don't even live in the Egan attendance area. They might switch back to Blach. It seems to make sense to switch these kids from Los Altos High School to Mountain View High School as well, given the imbalance in size between these two schools. They could stay in High School with all the kids they attended elementary school alongside for 7 years, whereas they now travel long distances to get to Egan and then Los Altos High School.

It is a compromise. Another factor is that there is no absolute guarantee that it would include the entire 19 acres at Egan. LASD recently started talking about using 5 acres for a teacher housing project (Nothing to do with BCSm but wouldn't be land for Egan either).

5 people like this
Posted by Maragret Makes Sense
a resident of Gemello
on Jun 19, 2018 at 3:23 pm

So does @Compromise. [Three Party Talks]

The district makes no sense (or rather talks nonsense) if it does not know that in the state of California estimates on classroom renovation are usually 1/5 of the cost of complete demolition and completely new classroom construction. The last building projects in the LASD used an architect/contractor that used these ratios to keep cost lower while improving LASD facilities.

Egan to BCS, new Egan in NEC is the grand Three Party Compromise. (LASD teacher housing on 'some of' Egan land)

Margaret Makes Sense

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

All your news. All in one place. Every day.

Los Altos's State of Mind opening NYC-inspired pizza shop in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 16 comments | 8,255 views

Flying: How much is enough? It's personal.
By Sherry Listgarten | 12 comments | 2,802 views

Wait, wait – we’re working on it
By Diana Diamond | 18 comments | 2,452 views

My Pet Peeves
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 7 comments | 1,909 views

Premarital and Couples: Here Be Dragons!
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,092 views


Short story writers wanted!

The 34th Annual Palo Alto Weekly Short Story Contest is now accepting entries for Adult, Young Adult and Teen categories. Send us your short story (2,500 words or less) and entry form by March 27, 2020. First, Second and Third Place prizes awarded in each category.

View Details