News


Feds: Parents paid tens of thousands to game the admissions system

Cheating on college-entrance exams included using a proctor who gave students the answers, using false pretenses to secure more time for students to take tests

The 204-page federal complaint filed by the United States Attorney's Office on March 12 in the case of a nationwide college-admissions scam details the lengths to which wealthy parents of high school students were willing to go to get their children into elite universities, from arranging for their students to cheat on college-entrance tests to making payments in the tens of thousands of dollars for help rigging college admissions.

Numerous local parents -- including two from Palo Alto, two from Menlo Park, two from Atherton and three from Hillsborough -- were indicted on Tuesday in the scheme, which allegedly involved up to $25 million in bribes to university coaches and employees in the college-admissions field. The federal complaint, based on evidence gathered by the FBI, outlined the role each parent allegedly played in the scheme, including how much they paid to a purported charitable foundation -- known as Key Worldwide Foundation, which allegedly laundered the money -- and the conversations they had with employees of the affiliated college-counseling business Edge College and Career Network, also known under the fictitious business name The Key.

William "Rick" Singer, who has been working with investigators since last September in the hope of receiving a more lenient sentence, founded The Key and the foundation in Sacramento then moved it to Newport Beach. He pleaded guilty on March 12 to racketeering conspiracy, money laundering conspiracy, conspiracy to defraud the United States and obstruction of justice.

Mark Riddell, a director of college-entrance-exam preparation at a private college preparatory school in Brandenton, Florida, is also cooperating with the investigators. Identified as facilitating test-taking fraud with many of the parents, Riddell agreed to plead guilty to charges of conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest services mail fraud.

In numerous cases, Riddell was paid $10,000 to either take or correct each student's test before submitting it for assessment, the federal complaint states. His involvement was verified through emails, consensual recordings and interviews with other witnesses, or other communications, according to the complaint.

The Parents

Palo Alto parents Amy and Gregory Colburn used The Key's services and allegedly participated in the scheme. In October 2017, Amy reached out to The Key staff for details about where their son would take a college-entrance exam from the nonprofit College Board. The Key staff responded back on Dec. 31, 2017 with an SAT admission ticket for their son that allowed him to take the test -- with extended time -- on March 10, 2018. Rather than take the test at a high school in Palo Alto, he would take it at the West Hollywood Test Center, according to the complaint. The test was scheduled with Riddell, who served as a proctor, the complaint states.

The West Hollywood site -- a private college preparatory school -- was one of two test locations in the country that Singer said he "controlled," according to the complaint. At those locations, he was able to bribe the test administrators to allow individualized test taking, with Riddell as the proctor.

In December 2017, Gregory Colburn, who is a radiation oncologist with ties to O'Connor Hospital in San Jose and the VA Palo Alto Health Care System, gave $25,000 to Key Worldwide Foundation, which was made by a transferred stock valued at $24,443.50 and a check of $547.45 with "charitable foundation" written in the memo.

Menlo Park resident Marjorie Klapper, co-owner of a Palo Alto jewelry business, made a $15,000 donation to Key Worldwide Foundation for her son to take a college entrance exam in late 2017. She had allegedly reached out to Singer months earlier, in March, after hearing that the daughter of another client made plans with him to take the ACT in Los Angeles.

When she asked if her son could also take the test under the same arrangement, Singer told her, "It is not a definite as there (is) a financial consideration to take it here. They will only do with a donation," according to the complaint.

Klapper exchanged emails with Singer about giving her son extra time to take the SAT and ACT exams. On June 10, 2017, she sent him a letter from College Board that allowed her son only 50 percent more time on the SAT -- not 100 percent more time, which she thought was required in order for him to take the test in West Hollywood.

Singer replied, "As long as you have ACT with 100 percent time we can take the test at an alternate site."

Arrangements were made to have Klapper's son take the ACT on Oct. 28, 2017 in West Hollywood with Riddell as the test proctor. The boy received a score of 30 out of 36 points on the exam.

Klapper emailed Singer a copy of the score in November 2017, noting: "Omg. I guess he's not testing again."

Singer replied, "Yep he is brilliant."

Menlo Park resident Peter Jan "P.J." Sartorio, president and co-founder of food companies PJ's Organics and Nate's, is accused of paying $15,000 in cash to have Riddell serve as the proctor for his daughter and correct her answers in June 2017. She had been approved to have additional time on the ACT test a month earlier. Sartorio had withdrawn the $15,000 through three transactions between June 16 and 20.

Sartorio's daughter scored 27 out of 36, which put her in the 86th percentile, according to the complaint. This placed her in a better position in comparison to her previous scores of 900 and 960 out of 1600, which she earned through the PSAT, positioning her in the 42nd and 51st percentile, respectively, for her grade level.

Repeat customers

Atherton couple Elizabeth and Manuel Henriquez allegedly participated in the scheme four times for their two daughters. The couple is also accused of bribing Georgetown University head tennis coach Gordon Ernst to list their older daughter as a tennis recruit, though records from the United States Tennis Association showed she didn't play in USTA tournaments as a high school student. Ernst allegedly received $950,000 from the Key Worldwide Foundation between Sept. 11, 2015 and Nov. 30, 2016.

In fall 2015, the Henriquezes allegedly paid $25,000 to have Riddell serve as the test proctor for their older daughter's SAT exam and correct her answers; $15,000 of the payment went to Singer's account. Riddell flew to the Bay Area and allegedly sat down next to the daughter during the test to provide her the answers at a private school in Belmont. She received a score of 1900 out of 2400 possible points, up by 320 points from her previous score on the same test. She was ultimately offered admission to Georgetown in spring 2016.

In May 2016, the Henriquez Family Trust paid $400,000 to Key Worldwide Foundation "to provide educational and self-enrichment programs to disadvantaged youth," the complaint states.

The Atherton couple also set up their younger daughter to take the ACT in Houston, Texas -- the second test center that Singer says he controlled -- with extra time in October 2016. Riddell proctored the test for the Henriquezes' daughter and another student; he allegedly told them to give wrong answers for different questions to conceal the conspiracy from ACT Inc., the complaint states. The younger daughter of the Henriquezes ended up with a score of 30 out of 36.

In lieu of payment, Manuel Henriquez agreed to use his influence at his alma mater, Northeastern University in Boston, to help Singer secure admission for an applicant to the school.

The Henriquezes allegedly also worked with Singer to have a third party take three SAT subject tests and the ACT test in 2017 for their younger daughter in West Hollywood at a cost ranging between $25,000 and $30,000. She received a score of 33 out of 36 on the ACT and scores of 720, 740 and 770 out of a possible 800 points on the SAT subject tests for math, Spanish and history, respectively.

Manuel Henriquez stepped down Wednesday as CEO of venture capital and private equity firm Hercules Capital in Palo Alto, the company announced in a press release.

Supposed star athletes

Hillsborough resident Marci Palatella allegedly took advantage of both The Key's schemes to falsify a student's athletic records as well as arrange for test-prep cheating.

She is charged with conspiring to ensure her son became a football recruit in his application to the University of Southern California.

Palatella reached out to Singer seeking tips on ways to "position" her son in his college applications. Singer had provided her with a price list that showed "the number (test scores) it would take to get admitted even with the fudging of the scores." Through emails, she described that the boy had played football but took a year off and wasn't necessarily "the team's star but a good solid player" with plans to continue participating in the sport the following year.

Singer worked with Laura Janke, a former assistant coach of women's soccer at USC, to create a false profile of Palatella's son that inaccurately called him an active player of his high school football team who assisted his team in winning local and state championships in 2015 and 2017, the complaint states.

In November 2017, the profile was leveraged by Donna Heinel, USC's senior associate athletic director, who sent it to a university subcommittee for athletic admissions and later in the month sent Singer an email indicating Palatella's son gained conditional acceptance. Palatella sent Heinel a $100,000 check made out to the USC Women's Athletic Board and also wired $400,000 to the foundation on April 1, 2018.

In addition, a psychologist who is Singer's acquaintance evaluated Palatella's son and provided the necessary medical documents that would allow him more test-taking time on the exams, according to the complaint.

On Feb. 27, 2017, Palatella's son was granted extended SAT time, and eight days later she wired $75,000 to one of the foundation's accounts. Her son took the test on March 12, 2017 in West Hollywood with Riddell as the proctor, coming out with a score of 1410 out of 1600.

In September 2015, Bruce and Davina Isackson of Hillsborough allegedly worked with Singer to create a false profile for their older daughter to gain admission to USC as a recruited soccer player through Janke, the complaint document states. About five months later, an assistant athletic director at USC told the university's women's soccer coach that the application was transferred to the regular admissions process as a result of a "clerical error."

After she was not admitted to USC, former USC women's head soccer coach Ali Khosroshanin sent the allegedly false profile to Jorge Salcedo, head coach of the University of California, Los Angeles's head coach of men's soccer. In June 2016, the Isacksons daughter was given provisional admission for that fall. The following month, The couple transferred 2,150 shares of Facebook stock valued at $251,249 to the foundation.

The Isacksons allegedly continued to engage in both the cheating and athlete-recruitment scheme with their younger daughter beginning in January 2017, when they requested arrangements to have the girl take the ACT over successive days, according to the complaint. Singer had the student take the test in West Hollywood in June 2017 with Riddell as the proctor, and she received a score of 31 out of 36.

The girl later secured admission to USC as a rowing recruit, a sport where she had no experience, though she was "an avid equestrian," the complaint states.

In October 2017, Singer sent Heinel a transcript and false ACT score for the Isackson's younger daughter; Janke created a profile for the girl that included false honors as a member of the Redwood Scullers. By the end of the year, she received conditional admission to USC but the family was advised to keep the news secret until late March 2018.

On April 20, 2018, Isackson transferred shares of stock valued at $249,420 to the foundation, $50,000 of which was set aside for Heinel.

In August 2018, the couple allegedly called Singer to help their third child get into college through false college entrance exam scores, a call that was intercepted by a court-authorized wiretap. Through the end of the year, Singer had three phone calls and an in-person meeting with the couple verifying the funds previously made in the scheme involving their other two children.

According to the complaint, an IRS audit of the Key Worldwide Foundation triggered the broader investigation.

Evidence for the cases against the Peninsula parents included consensually recorded phone calls with Singer under the direction of law-enforcement agents either October or November 2018, in which Singer verified that he and the parents were "on the same page" about the payment to "help underserved kids."

Facing the court

The Henriquezes appeared before a judge in the U.S. Southern District of New York with their attorney Jeffrey Brown on Tuesday when they were each released on $500,000 bond and restricted to travel within the continental U.S., with a 48-hour notice to be filed for any travel outside the Northern District of California. They also agreed to surrender travel documents and have no contact with other defendants in the case, except each other.

No federal court records for Davina Isackson were available online as of Wednesday afternoon.

The other Bay Area residents with Midpeninsula ties made their initial court appearance on the case before U.S. Magistrate Judge Joseph Spero in San Francisco on Tuesday. They were advised of their rights and charges alongside a court-provided attorney, Jodi Linker of the Federal Public Defender's Office, with the exception of Palatella, who was represented by Camilo Artiga-Purcell.

They were each released after posting varying amounts: Amy and Gregory Colburn, each on $500,000 bond; Marjorie Klapper on $250,000 bond; Sartorio on $100,000 bond; Palatella on $1 million bond; and Bruce Isackson on $2 million bond.

The eight defendants are scheduled to appear in federal court in Boston, Massachusetts on March 29.

If convicted, all nine defendants face a sentence of up to 20 years in prison, three years of supervised release, a fine of $250,000 or double the amount of the gross gain or loss, according to federal prosecutors.

Requests for comment from the families were not immediately returned.

What is community worth to you?
Support local journalism.

Comments

16 people like this
Posted by Good
a resident of Sylvan Park
on Mar 13, 2019 at 11:23 am

Good that cheaters got caught. My kid worked hard to get into college, too bad some kids got there because of the rich parents. On a side note: sportsmen getting a degree in something other than sports is ridiculous. Do you really want your doctor/lawyer/engineer to be the one who went to college because of the good physical shape?


16 people like this
Posted by Like Bullis
a resident of Another Mountain View Neighborhood
on Mar 13, 2019 at 11:46 am

The rich parents can buy they're kids way in. It's all in the admissions process or backroom exceptions when some wealthy parent starts dropping donations.


11 people like this
Posted by Sarah1000
a resident of another community
on Mar 13, 2019 at 12:01 pm

Sarah1000 is a registered user.

Both of my children went to De Anza while working and, then, applied to degree programs of their choice on their own. If independence is a goal, it’s a great option.


Like this comment
Posted by Now we know the first question for a yale grad
a resident of Rex Manor
on Mar 13, 2019 at 5:35 pm

How much money did your parents pay to get in?


4 people like this
Posted by confused
a resident of Cuernavaca
on Mar 13, 2019 at 7:43 pm

Parents have been paying for their kids to get into college since the beginning of time. Legacies and kids of donors have always had an advantage. That's why many parents continue to donate to their alma mater for years on end. What I don't understand is why anybody would bribe somebody (up to $6.5M?) to get their kid in when they could probably just donate to the college in exchange for admission?


5 people like this
Posted by Steven Nelson
a resident of Cuesta Park
on Mar 13, 2019 at 7:45 pm

Steven Nelson is a registered user.

Thank you Sarah1000! I think it is entirely ... I'm at a loss for respectful words ... for a school district trustee to say that "elite 4 year colleges" are the goal for our local districts. Sarah's kids and many going to 2 yr community colleges and 4 yr state colleges (hopefully not needing remedial education in English or Math) can do really fine in life.

One of the former Principals of Stevenson (MVWSD) is an example. He went to Chico State (by his choice, not his parents) just because he loved playing baseball and was very good at it. Afterwards - a teaching degree and afterwards Harvard Education School. So, he is off to a fine professional career - improving the world for kids (future adults and likely parents) and making a very reasonable MARK on The WORLD.

sweet - no "elite"


4 people like this
Posted by Sarah1000
a resident of another community
on Mar 14, 2019 at 8:08 am

Sarah1000 is a registered user.

@Steven Nelson My husband and I were both born and raised in Phoenix and were “on our own” at 18. Fortunately, in-state tuition for the three public Arizona universities is affordable, the admissions process is simple and the acceptance rates are high. We got our undergraduate degrees at U of A and our graduate degrees at ASU. My husband eventually became a CEO and now is a CEO coach as well as COB for some companies. There is a comedian who points out that all the information is the same whether you learn it at a community college or an elite university. So true, right?


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields


Don't be the last to know

Get the latest headlines sent straight to your inbox every day.

What Would it Take to Get Tech Companies to Move Jobs Out of the Region and Is This a Good Idea?
By Steve Levy | 25 comments | 1,548 views

Palo Alto's Taverna to expand next door
By Elena Kadvany | 2 comments | 1,456 views

A Power Play
By Sherry Listgarten | 10 comments | 1,359 views

College Match
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 961 views

Premarital and Couples: Valentine's Day: Annually or Daily?
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 863 views

 

Best of Mountain View ballot is here

It's time to decide what local business is worthy of the title "Best Of Mountain View" — and you get to decide! Cast your ballot online. Voting ends May 27th. Stay tuned for the results in the July 19th issue of the Mountain View Voice.

VOTE HERE