News

SyWest, Google fail to reach deal on North Bayshore development plans

Mountain View City Council set to step in, guide future of Shoreline Boulevard 'gateway' site

After nearly a month of negotiations, Google and SyWest are calling it quits on attempting to work together on developing the North Bayshore gateway site. Representatives from the two companies informed Mountain View officials last week that they were unable to reach a compromise on their conflicting building plans.

This means it will now fall to the Mountain View City Council to figure out how to develop the area near the Century Cinema theaters. In an idea proposed by Councilwoman Margaret Abe-Koga, the council stipulated that if negotiations failed, the city would draft its own master plan outlining what should be developed in the area.

Google and SyWest each own about half of the 30 acres that comprise the gateway property along Shoreline Boulevard. SyWest officials want to go it alone, developing their 16-acre portion into about 740 residential units, 880,000 square feet of offices and a new hotel, theater and shops. In contrast, Google officials want the entire property to be blended into larger plans for North Bayshore, building 1,200 homes and developing 275,000 square feet of office space at the gateway site.

City Council members declined to endorse either of the companies' plans during a review last month. Any new master plan compiled by city staff would eventually be brought before the City Council for approval.

What's local journalism worth to you?

Support Mountain View Online for as little as $5/month.

Learn more

Follow Mountain View Voice Online on Twitter @mvvoice, Facebook and on Instagram @mvvoice for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

SyWest, Google fail to reach deal on North Bayshore development plans

Mountain View City Council set to step in, guide future of Shoreline Boulevard 'gateway' site

by / Mountain View Voice

Uploaded: Wed, Mar 27, 2019, 10:18 am

After nearly a month of negotiations, Google and SyWest are calling it quits on attempting to work together on developing the North Bayshore gateway site. Representatives from the two companies informed Mountain View officials last week that they were unable to reach a compromise on their conflicting building plans.

This means it will now fall to the Mountain View City Council to figure out how to develop the area near the Century Cinema theaters. In an idea proposed by Councilwoman Margaret Abe-Koga, the council stipulated that if negotiations failed, the city would draft its own master plan outlining what should be developed in the area.

Google and SyWest each own about half of the 30 acres that comprise the gateway property along Shoreline Boulevard. SyWest officials want to go it alone, developing their 16-acre portion into about 740 residential units, 880,000 square feet of offices and a new hotel, theater and shops. In contrast, Google officials want the entire property to be blended into larger plans for North Bayshore, building 1,200 homes and developing 275,000 square feet of office space at the gateway site.

City Council members declined to endorse either of the companies' plans during a review last month. Any new master plan compiled by city staff would eventually be brought before the City Council for approval.

Comments

The Business Man
Registered user
Another Mountain View Neighborhood
on Mar 27, 2019 at 11:31 am
The Business Man, Another Mountain View Neighborhood
Registered user
on Mar 27, 2019 at 11:31 am
1 person likes this

Simply put:

The City assumed that these projects are REAL.

The counted the housing elements regarding reporting to the STATE regarding meeting housing quotas.

THAT WAS A BIG MISTAKE

NOW we have a very critical shortage that is expanding.


nihiLIST
Sylvan Park
on Mar 27, 2019 at 2:02 pm
nihiLIST, Sylvan Park
on Mar 27, 2019 at 2:02 pm
Like this comment

ALL is LOST. What are WE GOING to DO? This ARTICLE spoiled the REST OF MY DAY.


LBH
Castro City
on Mar 27, 2019 at 2:48 pm
LBH, Castro City
on Mar 27, 2019 at 2:48 pm
2 people like this

It's a game by both players. Smart growth needs to happen and they didn't want to play nice. Now the city has to step in and walk its talk. If they don't, then they too are all blah, blah, blah.


Measureable houseing shortage
Shoreline West
on Mar 28, 2019 at 7:59 am
Measureable houseing shortage, Shoreline West
on Mar 28, 2019 at 7:59 am
2 people like this

Can someone point out a measurement to gauge the housing shortage, that showes how bad it is, so we can see when it began, how bad it is, and what progress is being made or not made?

Without a measurement there can be no progress, or visibility.

Rental Vacancy rate perhaps?

What should our target be?


The Business Man
Registered user
Another Mountain View Neighborhood
on Mar 28, 2019 at 8:11 am
The Business Man, Another Mountain View Neighborhood
Registered user
on Mar 28, 2019 at 8:11 am
1 person likes this

In response to Measureable houseing shortage you said:

“Can someone point out a measurement to gauge the housing shortage, that showes how bad it is, so we can see when it began, how bad it is, and what progress is being made or not made?

Without a measurement there can be no progress, or visibility.”

Here is some real information from the Association of Bay Area Governments.

The 2007-2014 housing report stated that:

Mountain View had a need of Very Low housing of 571 but only had 237 which reached 42%, Low Income Housing 388 but only had 28 which reached 7%, Moderate Income housing of 488 but only had 4 which reached 1%, Above Moderate housing of 1,152 but had 2,387 or reached 207% of the needs.

Compare with current record:

Mountain View had a need of Very Low Income Housing of 814 but has only provided 120 which reached 15%, Low Income housing of 492 but has only provided 135 which reached 27%, Moderate income housing of 527 but provided no additional housing which reached 0%, and Above Moderate housing of 1,093 but has 2,004 which reached 183%.

The fact is the City of Mountain View is failing to provide adequate housing period, and it has been all the fault of the City Council. I am not playing favorites with my assessment.


William Hitchens
Registered user
Waverly Park
on Mar 28, 2019 at 5:03 pm
William Hitchens, Waverly Park
Registered user
on Mar 28, 2019 at 5:03 pm
6 people like this

Google is very well managed and I trust it to have oodles of "enlightened self-interest" --- and to realize that what is good for MV long-term also is good for Google long-term. SyWest is a two bit real estate player that wants to realize its short-term real-estate profits --- period. Google is a dominant Internet Marketing player that wants to maximize its long-term core competency growth and profits. Google should just "make SyWest an offer it can't refuse" and get them totally out of any future planning. Real estate people are "transactional", just like the Criminal & Insane Monster infesting OUR White House, NOT his.


The Business Man
Registered user
Another Mountain View Neighborhood
on Mar 29, 2019 at 8:09 am
The Business Man, Another Mountain View Neighborhood
Registered user
on Mar 29, 2019 at 8:09 am
Like this comment

William Hitchens:

I can only say this, you are naive to think that Google has Mountain View interests in mind.

THe whole idea is to maximize tax credits, allowances and direct financial assistance from public resources so that it can come out with the largest ROI on the project.

They have not proven any real intent to get anything done. They haven't yet picked up a shovel.


Bonus retraction
another community
on Mar 29, 2019 at 9:24 am
Bonus retraction, another community
on Mar 29, 2019 at 9:24 am
Like this comment

So here's an idea. The original joint proposal 1 a bonus 1.1 million square feet of added office space beyond with their already entitled to build on that land. So if they can agree on a plan just retract the bonus 1.1 million square feet of Office Space. I can't see any argument why if the plan falls through then they deserve the bonus.

basically that's about 6,600 added workers so you did an awful lot of new housing units like maybe three thousand to cancel that out none of their plans has ever talked about building 3000 housing units on that land. and there's also the base amount of movie theater comnercial and office space which is going to create demand. certainly don't let Google take that 1.1 million square feet of office space and build it on other land elsewhere in North Bayshore. That would just be ridiculous. This is a chance to fix a mistake and if they lose 500 units of the promised housing from Google I don't see any problem with that even if they lose a thousand of the promised units it's so much of a better offset to lose that bonus office space that they can afford to have less new housing units built.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.