News

Mountain View passes new rules mandating safe gun storage

The Mountain View City Council just passed an ordinance mandating safe gun storage in homes and vehicles. Courtesy Getty Images.

Gun owners in Mountain View will soon be required to safely lock away their firearms under a new citywide ordinance.

In a public hearing Tuesday, Feb. 22, the Mountain View City Council voted unanimously to approve an ordinance laying out how guns must be stored when unattended in homes or vehicles.

The measure comes more than two years after the council agreed to develop a firearm safety policy following the mass shooting at the Gilroy Garlic Festival in July 2019 that killed three people and wounded 17 others. Since then, the council has explored options to improve gun safety within the city, according to a staff report.

Back in January 2020, the council explored several other gun regulation policies, including banning people selling firearms out of homes or imposing location-based restrictions on where guns can be sold, which it chose not to pursue. The council did agree to draft an ordinance prohibiting the possession of firearms on all city property, which was adopted in April 2021. And in June 2021, the council added development of a safe gun storage ordinance to its work plan, according to a staff report.

The policy is aimed at improving public safety by making it less likely for gun-related fatalities and injuries — both accidental and intentional — to occur.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

Studies show that storing unloaded firearms in a safe manner can decrease the risk for suicide. Research also indicates that the vast majority of guns used in youth suicides, unintentional shootings involving youth, or school shootings perpetrated by minors come from the minor's home or the homes of relatives or friends, according to staff.

Other local communities, including Sunnyvale, Los Altos, San Jose, Palo Alto, Morgan Hill and unincorporated Santa Clara County, already require the safe storage of firearms in residences.

In California, it is unlawful to store firearms in a manner in which a child is "likely" to gain access without permission, but the law doesn't provide further guidance on what exactly constitutes safe gun storage. Mountain View's ordinance aims to clearly tell residents what constitutes safe storage: the firearm needs to be in a locked container or disabled with a trigger lock, according to the city.

Under the new ordinance all firearms in residences must be stored in a locked container or disabled with a trigger lock unless they are being carried or in the close proximity and control of someone.

In unattended vehicles, firearms must be stored in a locked trunk or container. For vehicles with four wheels and no trunk, guns must be in a locked container affixed to the vehicle and out of view. For vehicles with fewer than four wheels and no trunk, it has to be kept in a locked container that is permanently affixed to the vehicle. Firearms cannot be stored overnight in an unattended vehicle.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

Violations of the ordinance will be considered misdemeanors once the law takes effect.

When it comes to enforcement, police officers in Mountain View won't proactively check to see if people are in compliance with the ordinance, but they will have discretion to cite or arrest someone found in violation, whether arising from contact with that person for another lawful reason, if someone reports a violation, or if an incident occurs.

In a public comment, Susie MacLean, a board member of the organization Scrubs Addressing the Firearm Epidemic (SAFE), a nonprofit for the medical community to advocate against gun violence, said that only about 35% of California firearm owners store all firearms in the safest way -- locked and unloaded.

"By passing this ordinance and following through with a public education effort to improve safe storage, we will be able to save lives," she said.

A woman who identified herself only as Karen said that she had lost a child to gun violence and urged the City Council to pass the safe gun storage ordinance in Mountain View "to prevent another family from suffering the loss of their dearly loved one."

Lisa Henry, a volunteer with Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America and a Mountain View resident, said it was urgent to pass the ordinance. During the COVID-19 pandemic, she said, there has been a 43% increase in the unintentional deaths of small children and a 9% increase in teen suicides.

Of the eight people who spoke in public comments about the ordinance, only one did not fully support it. Charles Prael, who identified as a member of the shooting community in the South Bay and a Mountain View resident, said he had concerns about how the ordinance would impact the defensive use of guns and a court case headed to the U.S. Supreme Court that could open the city up to litigation. He recommended the city meet with gun rights organizations to "see if there is a way to make the intent of the ordinance work within the letter of the law and within the U.S. Constitution."

Assistant City Attorney Megan Marevich said that safe gun storage ordinances had survived constitutional challenges, and that she wasn't concerned that Mountain View's ordinance would be overturned by a constitutional challenge.

Council members expressed support for the ordinance, and with several adding that they're hoping to push for further gun safety legislation in the future.

"I think we have to continue to push on every single front that we can ... the alternative is unthinkable. I hope the council will continue to create a wall of safety around our communities for young people and for everyone in our community," said council member Sally Lieber.

"We've just all been devastated for many, many years with report after report after report of incidental shootings that happened with unsecured guns and mass shootings, and it's really a national tragedy," council member Pat Showalter said. "Keeping these guns out of harm's way will be effective, at least here, and that's what we have control over."

Vice Mayor Alison Hicks talked about how she lost a friend in middle school to an unsafely stored gun. "I will be thinking of Leo when I vote for this motion," she said. "I'm particularly looking forward to public education around this. That's what would have saved my friend Leo."

"I hope in the coming years we can continue to work on this issue and promote gun safety," council member Margaret Abe-Koga said. "I think there's more work to be done."

Craving a new voice in Peninsula dining?

Sign up for the Peninsula Foodist newsletter.

Sign up now

Follow Mountain View Voice Online on Twitter @mvvoice, Facebook and on Instagram @mvvoice for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Stay informed on important city government news. Sign up for our FREE daily Express newsletter.

Mountain View passes new rules mandating safe gun storage

by / Mountain View Voice

Uploaded: Thu, Feb 24, 2022, 11:14 am

Gun owners in Mountain View will soon be required to safely lock away their firearms under a new citywide ordinance.

In a public hearing Tuesday, Feb. 22, the Mountain View City Council voted unanimously to approve an ordinance laying out how guns must be stored when unattended in homes or vehicles.

The measure comes more than two years after the council agreed to develop a firearm safety policy following the mass shooting at the Gilroy Garlic Festival in July 2019 that killed three people and wounded 17 others. Since then, the council has explored options to improve gun safety within the city, according to a staff report.

Back in January 2020, the council explored several other gun regulation policies, including banning people selling firearms out of homes or imposing location-based restrictions on where guns can be sold, which it chose not to pursue. The council did agree to draft an ordinance prohibiting the possession of firearms on all city property, which was adopted in April 2021. And in June 2021, the council added development of a safe gun storage ordinance to its work plan, according to a staff report.

The policy is aimed at improving public safety by making it less likely for gun-related fatalities and injuries — both accidental and intentional — to occur.

Studies show that storing unloaded firearms in a safe manner can decrease the risk for suicide. Research also indicates that the vast majority of guns used in youth suicides, unintentional shootings involving youth, or school shootings perpetrated by minors come from the minor's home or the homes of relatives or friends, according to staff.

Other local communities, including Sunnyvale, Los Altos, San Jose, Palo Alto, Morgan Hill and unincorporated Santa Clara County, already require the safe storage of firearms in residences.

In California, it is unlawful to store firearms in a manner in which a child is "likely" to gain access without permission, but the law doesn't provide further guidance on what exactly constitutes safe gun storage. Mountain View's ordinance aims to clearly tell residents what constitutes safe storage: the firearm needs to be in a locked container or disabled with a trigger lock, according to the city.

Under the new ordinance all firearms in residences must be stored in a locked container or disabled with a trigger lock unless they are being carried or in the close proximity and control of someone.

In unattended vehicles, firearms must be stored in a locked trunk or container. For vehicles with four wheels and no trunk, guns must be in a locked container affixed to the vehicle and out of view. For vehicles with fewer than four wheels and no trunk, it has to be kept in a locked container that is permanently affixed to the vehicle. Firearms cannot be stored overnight in an unattended vehicle.

Violations of the ordinance will be considered misdemeanors once the law takes effect.

When it comes to enforcement, police officers in Mountain View won't proactively check to see if people are in compliance with the ordinance, but they will have discretion to cite or arrest someone found in violation, whether arising from contact with that person for another lawful reason, if someone reports a violation, or if an incident occurs.

In a public comment, Susie MacLean, a board member of the organization Scrubs Addressing the Firearm Epidemic (SAFE), a nonprofit for the medical community to advocate against gun violence, said that only about 35% of California firearm owners store all firearms in the safest way -- locked and unloaded.

"By passing this ordinance and following through with a public education effort to improve safe storage, we will be able to save lives," she said.

A woman who identified herself only as Karen said that she had lost a child to gun violence and urged the City Council to pass the safe gun storage ordinance in Mountain View "to prevent another family from suffering the loss of their dearly loved one."

Lisa Henry, a volunteer with Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America and a Mountain View resident, said it was urgent to pass the ordinance. During the COVID-19 pandemic, she said, there has been a 43% increase in the unintentional deaths of small children and a 9% increase in teen suicides.

Of the eight people who spoke in public comments about the ordinance, only one did not fully support it. Charles Prael, who identified as a member of the shooting community in the South Bay and a Mountain View resident, said he had concerns about how the ordinance would impact the defensive use of guns and a court case headed to the U.S. Supreme Court that could open the city up to litigation. He recommended the city meet with gun rights organizations to "see if there is a way to make the intent of the ordinance work within the letter of the law and within the U.S. Constitution."

Assistant City Attorney Megan Marevich said that safe gun storage ordinances had survived constitutional challenges, and that she wasn't concerned that Mountain View's ordinance would be overturned by a constitutional challenge.

Council members expressed support for the ordinance, and with several adding that they're hoping to push for further gun safety legislation in the future.

"I think we have to continue to push on every single front that we can ... the alternative is unthinkable. I hope the council will continue to create a wall of safety around our communities for young people and for everyone in our community," said council member Sally Lieber.

"We've just all been devastated for many, many years with report after report after report of incidental shootings that happened with unsecured guns and mass shootings, and it's really a national tragedy," council member Pat Showalter said. "Keeping these guns out of harm's way will be effective, at least here, and that's what we have control over."

Vice Mayor Alison Hicks talked about how she lost a friend in middle school to an unsafely stored gun. "I will be thinking of Leo when I vote for this motion," she said. "I'm particularly looking forward to public education around this. That's what would have saved my friend Leo."

"I hope in the coming years we can continue to work on this issue and promote gun safety," council member Margaret Abe-Koga said. "I think there's more work to be done."

Comments

Dan Waylonis
Registered user
Jackson Park
on Feb 24, 2022 at 2:38 pm
Dan Waylonis, Jackson Park
Registered user
on Feb 24, 2022 at 2:38 pm

If the mass shooting in Gilroy is the motivation for more gun restrictions, I don't see how requiring people to lock up their guns at home would have prevented that tragedy. Also, for people who live alone, locking them up makes little sense. If a burglary occurs, the thief will take the entire gun box and open it later. Finally, how will the city measure the success of this restriction? If it makes no change in the illegal use of firearms in Mountain View, will the restriction be lifted?


redhawk524
Registered user
another community
on Feb 24, 2022 at 5:58 pm
redhawk524, another community
Registered user
on Feb 24, 2022 at 5:58 pm

I really don't understand what is new here, and I don't understand how this actually solves anything. Keeping a gun in a safe that I know the combo for is going to reduce my chance of suicide? Really? Don't get me wrong, I think people totally should keep their firearms stored safely to prevent unauthorized access, but there are several problems: 1) enforcement - if someone doesn't comply, how would anyone know? It specifically says the police will not proactively enforce it. Most of the time you don't until after it happens. 2) If someone goes unhinged and decides to do something bad, is it really going to prevent anything if they have the key to the lock? Cars are locked, but if some guy decides to plow through a crowd or kill themselves by driving off a cliff, is that lock really going to prevent anything?

Again, I am not against safe storage. I am against the expectation that it will make improvements in stats that the article states.


Mike
Registered user
Rex Manor
on Feb 24, 2022 at 7:10 pm
Mike, Rex Manor
Registered user
on Feb 24, 2022 at 7:10 pm

Echoing Hicks: "I'm particularly looking forward to public education around this."

Gun owners have a responsibility for safety at all times. Education goes a long way here, and CA gun purchasers and hunters are already generally required to have safety training. Perhaps we should consider legislating gun safety training for the entire household, not just the individual purchaser of new guns or hunters. Ideally, everyone would know the basic rules of guns safety.

Restrictive local regulations like this new ordinance make outdoor recreation in California frustrating and gives outsiders "ammunition" that CA is restricting freedoms. I grew up with guns in another state, still love to hunt and fish, but don't do either in California because I can't stomach the disparate rules. My introduction to CA fishing 18 yrs ago was: first day + first cast + wrong section of a river with a barbed hook = big fine. I don't fish or hunt in CA because of that - unfortunate for my kids - and a little education by the ranger (instead of a fine) would have went a long way. My kids were trained in CA for hunter's safety, and through education & skill development (hunting 1-on-1 in another state) I am confident that if a gun appears to them in a social situation they will not be on either end of an Alec Baldwin situation. The lack of training and familiarity with guns is a real problem.


PeaceLove
Registered user
Shoreline West
on Feb 24, 2022 at 10:05 pm
PeaceLove, Shoreline West
Registered user
on Feb 24, 2022 at 10:05 pm

I think peoples' reaction to this new ruling will fall along sharp tribal lines. Those who oppose guns and think gun owners are pathological will support any and all restrictions on the rights of gun owners. Those for whom gun ownership is normal will find this an obviously onerous restriction on their right to keep a gun handy for home defense in an emergency (try unlocking a gun safe in the dark in the middle of the night in the case of a home invasion).

Open Source Defense ("100% gun rights, 0% culture war") is a good place to learn more about what is and isn't true around guns and society. Here's from a recent post:

"The core of modern, yes-guns-are-weapons gun culture is that ownership of weapons is a feature, not a bug, in a free society. For someone who’s not fluent in cultures where that’s the common view, it’s a jarring idea. Reflecting on the idea of a concealed carrier putting on a gun in the morning, they might think, “What a shame that they feel a desire to do that. One day society will mature beyond that.” Whereas the concealed carrier is thinking, “How empowering that I can do this. One day society will mature to the point that this is ubiquitous.” (Legally, concealed carry is in fact on its way to ubiquity. But you know what we mean. In the few remaining states where it’s a privilege with which the state blesses a chosen few, it’s by definition very rare.)

So you’ve got two people reflecting on the same act and interpreting it in diametrically opposite ways. The first person sees anti-social paranoia. The second sees pro-social personal responsibility."
Web Link


Greg David
Registered user
Old Mountain View
on Feb 24, 2022 at 10:21 pm
Greg David, Old Mountain View
Registered user
on Feb 24, 2022 at 10:21 pm

Woohoo!

The city council did nothing to change nothing. Pretty much much par for the course. At least they can add a line to their political resume that they did “something”

Their actions are unenforceable, unconstitutional, and utterly asinine. The only people this will (adversely) affect are those unwitting citizens that admit guilt under duress from law enforcement.


Proud Taxpayer
Registered user
Willowgate
on Feb 24, 2022 at 11:03 pm
Proud Taxpayer, Willowgate
Registered user
on Feb 24, 2022 at 11:03 pm
Randy Guelph
Registered user
Cuernavaca
on Feb 25, 2022 at 8:47 am
Randy Guelph, Cuernavaca
Registered user
on Feb 25, 2022 at 8:47 am

PeaceLove, that site says they are "about making new gun owners," so you're being a bit disingenuous when you say they're a good place to learn "what is and isn't true." They have a stated agenda to get more people to own guns!


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.