|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
City budgets are complex documents — a tangle of employee positions, infrastructure projects and arcane accounting that all come to a head each year around June. But the big theme of Mountain View’s $125 million budget is the city is due to get a huge windfall — and officials have already figured out how to spend some of it.
The city recently has been conducting appraisals on various properties leased to Google. And as luck would have it, Mountain View financial staff are reporting the value of these sites has skyrocketed.
For example, the 21.6-acre North Bayshore site known as North Charleston was re-evaluated last year and saw a 141 percent increase in value. That translates into an extra $3.3 million each year in lease revenues for the city’s coffers.
Another Google-leased property, the Crittenden site, has approximately doubled in value. That lease is now expected to provide an extra $3.1 million annually for the city.
This good fortune has been a long time coming, said city Finance Director Patty Kong. Mountain View originally signed leases for North Charleston and Crittenden in the mid-1990s with the agreement they would be reappraised every 10 years. That means both sites were last reassessed around 2006, unfortunate timing, as the approaching Great Recession meant they were locked in at a relatively low value for a decade.
That all changed last year as the scheduled time arrived to revalue these two sites. The city hired an appraiser; Google hired an appraiser, and both parties negotiated on a new amount that was somewhere in between.
“You can see now that these leases are all coming due during a very high assessed-value period,” Kong said. “These property leases have become a very good source of revenue generation.”
More good news is coming down the line as the city will also be reassessing the value of the two parcels that comprise the Charleston East property. This site is where the company is currently launching a major construction effort to build the first of its signature canopied dome office complexes. That new appraisal is scheduled for February 2018.
City officials have already found one substantial way to spend the lease revenues — they’re planning a series of raises for the 585-person City Hall workforce. Through several new union contracts stretching through 2020, Mountain View officials have agreed to give most employees a 4 percent raise this year and one again next year.
A smaller salary increase that varies across employee groups is also planned for 2019-2020. Most employee groups agreed to take 1 or 2 percent raises for this period.
Those salary increases will cost Mountain View a total of about $3.8 million for the 2017-2018 fiscal year. According to the Voice’s estimates, those higher wages will cost roughly $7.8 million as the second increase kicks in during the 2018-2019 fiscal year. By 2020, that annual cost could balloon to about $9.8 million.
The Voice tabulated these figures for future years based on amounts provided by city finance officials, although one public employee group has not yet signed a new contract. The EAGLES association, which represents various City Hall professionals, has reportedly reached an impasse in negotiations with city administrators. For these employees, the Voice used a reasonable estimate based on the salary increase schedule agreed to by most other employee groups.
The bargaining agreements were approved by the City Council earlier this month after several closed-door meetings with union representatives. On June 13, council members approved new contracts with the Service Employees International Union, which represents 168 city employees and the 68 members of the International Association of Fire Fighters. On the same night, the council members also signed agreements with various unrepresented employee groups.
“We value the work of our employees and their pay should be above average,” Councilman Lenny Siegel said ahead of the vote. “When we put together these packages, we’re thinking of our employees and thanking them for what they do.”
It should be noted that Mountain View’s employees are not all paid from the city’s projected $128 million in general fund revenues for the coming fiscal year. Some positions, such as interim planners, are funded through developer fees held in separate accounts. The city’s full annual revenues are projected to surpass $312 million.
The City Council approved all the contracts in unanimous votes.
For the fiscal year beginning July 1, the city’s budget calls for spending around $61 million in infrastructure projects, which could be a city record, according to staff. Those dozens of projects include construction of new parks at Wyandotte Street and at the corner of Evandale Avenue and Piazza Drive. A third new park would be designed for an unspecified location in the South Whisman area. In North Bayshore, the city is planning to use $12 million to begin building reversible bus lanes along Shoreline Boulevard.
Perhaps the most relevant budget issue for most Mountain View residents is buried near the back of the nearly 600-page document. Utility rates are due once again for a sizable increase. Water rates are slated to go up by 7.1 percent while sewer and trash services will both rise by 10.1 percent. City officials indicate these increases will together amount to about a $10 increase on a monthly utility bill for a single-family household. Commercial and large apartment ratepayers will see a smaller, 2 percent increase in garbage rates instead of the 10 percent hike.





Be sure to report the increases and totals for the top dogs: the city manager, the city attorney and department heads. The city attorney should get more money to help her repay tenants rippied off for $15 million by the temporary restraining order to which she agreed in the landlords’ lawsuit against the rent control initiative filed just before Christmas.
http://transparentcalifornia.com/salaries/2016/mountain-view/
the link above is 2016 salaries for Mountain View
Holy smokes! I no longer wonder why there is so much growth! All of these city employees make more than Doctors with 26 years of education. No wonder the city is motivated to continue with the growth. They make more money!!!!
I opened the Web Link above. Yikes!! Overtime for Vieyra $120,085 (yes, overtime!)… And there are plenty of additional examples. Isn’t hiring additional bodies more economical?
Congress = 535 & MV= 585, something to think about.
City Manager should be fired with such significant overtime pay going out.
Is that pension spiking perhaps?
Yeah, let’s spend ALL the new money coming in so we’ll have big future obligations regardless of how the economy’s doing. And let’s not forget about future pension growth we’re locking in. I honestly can not believe these overtime numbers!
If the city has $3 million extra, why not invest in extra community services and infrastructure?
Palo Alto is investing $9 million in bike lanes. Local parks can alway use extra improvements.
Certain streets can be made safer, like around Graham Middle School.
There must be many things that more directly benefit residents than direct staff salary increases.
Most of the police and Fireman get 70% of their last few years of pay in retirement too. Big pension liability for years!
Good!!
9.8M of 125M is totally appropriate.
People who serve those making 300k and up shouldn’t be asked to live on 100k
This is fair, I wish more people could see that.
These salaries and benefits are greater than most tech workers in the area. Why the voters in Mountain View are not angry about this naked greed is beyond me. We deserve people that want to serve the public interest in Government. Now it is all about greed, money for pensions and self-interest. I am very sorry to see this happen.
Do the fire stations get ‘alarm’ bonuses? In some cities, there is be a bonus for each alarm that they goes to. sometimes this means they get 25 firefighters to put out a dumpster fire
When your employees make more money than you and drive a nicer car, something is wrong. What do they do to earn more than their individual employers, ie., tax and rate payers? These government employees are overpaid in all aspects.
How about paying off bonds, reducing fees?
I’m having a hard time wrapping my head around $233,686 in overtime. How does an employee’s overtime pay equal TWICE their regular pay??!!
the problem with California at the local, county, and state levels is that there is no effective opposition party. The Democrats have a super majority and can do basically whatevee they wish to do without any fear of losing power. This is completely unhealthy (and would be equally so if it were the republicans who dominated)
One party systems never end well