April Cole takes an “I Voted” sticker after casting a ballot at a polling site at the California Museum in Sacramento on March 5, 2024. Photo by Miguel Gutierrez Jr., CalMatters

The latest official tally from the Secretary of State’s office shows that 4.8 million ballots have been counted from California’s primary, with 2.5 million still to go.

Based on the late Friday numbers, the total of nearly 7.3 million votes means a turnout of about 33%, well below the norm for presidential primaries, but not the record low that some analysts projected based on early numbers.

It also means that it’s going to be a while before some results are finalized, likely amplifying complaints that it takes too long to count votes in California. While voting by mail has been happening for a month, as long as ballots were postmarked by last Tuesday and they arrive at elections offices by this Tuesday, they will be counted. As expected, the votes being counted after primary day are trending more Democratic and younger.

While the U.S. Senate and other races have been called by media organizations, and candidates have declared victory or conceded in others, many other closer contests and the only statewide ballot measure, Proposition 1, still hang in the balance. The Secretary of State has until April 12 to certify the results.

At the same time, the state has been trying to increase voter registration: The rate among all eligible voters is now at 83%, up from 68% in 2008. But those new voters are less likely to regularly cast ballots, which leads to a lower percentage turnout.

A new Public Policy Institute of California brief points out that automatic registration through the Department of Motor Vehicles has increased the registration rate by four percentage points since 2018. 

But while the changes were designed to make the electorate more representative of California’s diversity, there have been only small increases for historically underrepresented groups, the report says.

And new registrants tend to be less familiar with elections and are less likely to actually vote. In 2020, the turnout gap between them and voters overall was similar to the existing gap between voters older than 65 and those younger than 25, who are also less likely to vote. 

  • The report: “New registrants… have less experience with the political system and need more engagement to become regular voters.”

Campaign finance: The state’s campaign finance watchdog has a new leader. Late Friday, Gov. Gavin Newsom announced he has appointed Adam Silver as chairperson of the Fair Political Practices Commission. Silver, a Democrat and chief counsel for the Assembly Legislative Ethics Committee since 2018 and the commission counsel from 2017 to 2018, replaces Richard Miadich, chairperson since 2019. Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas called Silver “a true ambassador for compliance.” The position does not require Senate confirmation and pays $241,728 a year.

Get CalMatters text alerts: We can send you our latest investigations, election coverage and more, and you can send us story tips, comments and feedback. Sign up here.

Can homeless encampments govern themselves?

Jeanne Gillis cooks ground turkey over a wood fire beside her trailer at Camp Resolution on Feb. 28, 2024. Residents must rely on bottled water, generators, and wood fires because no utilities are provided at the camp. Photo by Fred Greaves for CalMatters
Jeanne Gillis cooks ground turkey over a wood fire beside her trailer at Camp Resolution on Feb. 28, 2024. Photo by Fred Greaves for CalMatters

Initially regarded as a potential solution for part of the state’s homeless crisis, a city-approved, self-governing homeless camp in Sacramento isn’t going as well as activists and camp residents hoped, writes CalMatters homelessness reporter Marisa Kendall.

Despite more than 181,000 people now living on California streets, a 2018 federal appeals court decision limits cities from clearing encampments unless they can offer residents a place to go. Though this policy may change after the U.S. Supreme Court takes another look at the case, cities in the meantime have looked into safe sleeping sites as a cost-effective way to allow homeless residents to go about their lives while potentially curtailing other encampments from cropping up in “sensitive community areas,” such as near schools and transit stops.

After the city of Sacramento agreed to lease the grounds of an existing encampment for free to a homeless advocacy group, Camp Resolution became one such site. The city provided a handful of trailers, portable toilets, dumpsters and ongoing trash pickup for residents. 

But other than that, it has largely taken a hands-off approach and Camp Resolution residents must fend for themselves. The place has no electricity or running water, community members donate food and a shower service operated by a nonprofit recently stopped coming by. The county’s District Attorney’s Office is also threatening the city to close the camp, citing public health hazards.

  • Joyce Jones, a resident and co-founder of Camp Resolution: “We try to make it as comfortable as possible, but sometimes it’s impossible…. It’s not going very well. I think that (the city) should do a little bit more.”

For more about Camp Resolution, read Marisa’s story.

Speaking of Californians living on the edge: California is offering one-time Disaster CalFresh benefits to San Diego County residents affected by the January storms, reports Justo Robles of CalMatters’ California Divide team. The application window is tight: It opened March 7 and ends Friday.

To apply, residents can call the county’s social services office at 877-847-3663 (FOOD) or submit a pre-registration application. The state’s social services department said it will provide 30 days of food benefits to families who qualify. Eligible applicants include households that lost food or income due to the storm, or incurred evacuation-related expenses such as hotel or transportation charges. Storm-impacted families already receiving CalFresh do not qualify, and can seek supplemental CalFresh benefits. 

Learn more about Disaster CalFresh in Justo’s story.

A new wrinkle in ‘PaneraGate’

Maria Maldonado, CFFWU Statewide Field Director, leads a panel at the California Fast Food Workers Union SEIU Membership Launch Event in Los Angeles on Feb. 9, 2024. Photo by Jules Hotz for CalMatters
Maria Maldonado, the California Fast Food Workers Union statewide field director, leads a panel at the union membership launch event in Los Angeles on Feb. 9, 2024. Photo by Jules Hotz for CalMatters

The calls continue for an investigation into the dealings between Gov. Newsom and a big donor over a carve-out from California’s higher minimum wage for fast food workers that kicks in April 1. 

After Bloomberg broke the story, Newsom and the donor both denied any misdeeds. Not only that, Newsom’s office declared that bakeries had to pay the $20 an hour after all, and billionaire Greg Flynn said he would do so at his Panera Bread franchises.

Still, legislative Republican leaders sent a letter to Newsom demanding records on the exemption and any communications between Newsom’s office and Flynn. 

  • Senate GOP leader Brian Jones, in a statement: “If Governor Newsom is as innocent as he claims, he should be eager to clear his name by handing over these records.” 

But Jones and Assembly Republican leader James Gallagher also concede that some records may be exempt from disclosure under state public records laws.

And KCRA’s Ashley Zavala has uncovered a reason why any investigation may be even more difficult: Those involved in the final negotiations had to sign non-disclosure agreements; sources told her that the Service Employees International Union, which sponsored the law, required them. Newsom’s office says that he didn’t sign an NDA and didn’t direct anyone else to do so.

Zavala also reported Friday that this deal may have broader impact: Republican Assemblymember Vince Fong says he will amend a bill to invalidate any legislation that includes NDAs.

  • Fong, to KCRA: “Transparency in government is the foundation of our democracy…. Public officials, paid by taxpayers, are trusted to carry out the people’s business in a fair and equitable manner.”

And lastly: Youth apprenticeships

High school senior Catalina Govea, 17, helps a fourth-grade student at Linden Elementary School in San Joaquin County as part of a youth apprenticeship program on March 5, 2024. Photo by Manuel Orbegozo for CalMatters
High school senior Catalina Govea, 17, helps a student at Linden Elementary School in San Joaquin County as part of a youth apprenticeship program on March 5, 2024. Photo by Manuel Orbegozo for CalMatters

California is expanding apprenticeship programs for young people — another path to jobs that can pay as much as $77,000 a year. But there’s a potential snag. Find out from Alejandra Reyes-Velarde of CalMatters’ California Divide team what it is.

CalMatters Commentary

CalMatters columnist Dan Walters is away.

CalMatters contributor Julie Lynem: With no statewide mandate, communities are left to enact redistricting reforms that cut out partisan influence. San Luis Obispo appears to be next.

Attention young journalists: The CalMatters Youth Journalism Initiative is holding its second Earth Day commentary contest. You can make an impact on important issues, get advice from CalMatters reporters and, oh, you might win as much as $500. The deadline is March 25.

Other things worth your time:

Some stories may require a subscription to read.

Steve Garvey’s “Seinfeld”-esque campaign is working so far // San Francisco Chronicle

What could be next for Katie Porter after US Senate loss? // The Orange County Register

CA bill to help renters with pets is less extreme than portrayed // Politico

Death penalty likely to stay on hold under next governor // San Francisco Chronicle

Will CA follow Oregon’s ‘strategic’ approach to psychedelics? // Capitol Weekly

US hiring keeps booming, so why is CA lagging behind? // Los Angeles Times

Big Oil faces a flood of climate lawsuits in CA and other states // Grist

Officials investigate oil sheen off Huntington Beach // The Orange County Register

CA could get a new city soon after Mountain House vote // Los Angeles Times

English learner advocates oppose ‘science of reading’ bill // EdSource

Shift in China-US trade is hurting CA, helping Texas // Los Angeles Times

Pajaro still struggling to recover a year after devastating flood // San Francisco Chronicle

CalMatters is a Sacramento-based nonpartisan, nonprofit journalism venture committed to explaining how California's state Capitol works and why it matters. It works with more than 130 media partners throughout the state that have long, deep relationships with their local audiences, including Embarcadero Media.

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

  1. I notice that election turnout this time was still very low (though perhaps not a record low), despite the many changes in California election law over the past several decades. Each one of those changes was sold to us as a way to make voting easier and more convenient, because the old ways were just too hard, we were told. Each one involved loosening voting rules and opening up more ways that the process could be messed with. We were confidently told, however, that any such disadvantages would be more than compensated for by big increases in voter turnout. So now we’re stuck with the disadvantages while the promised result is nowhere to be found.

Leave a comment