Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

Homeless community college students will be permitted to park and sleep in their cars overnight at any community college in California if Assembly Bill 302 passes.

AB 302 is a proposed state mandate that would require community colleges with parking facilities to allow overnight parking for homeless students. The schools would apply to the state to get their expenses reimbursed for creating these safe parking lots.

To qualify for the program, students must be enrolled in courses, have paid for those courses and must be in good standing with their college.

Assemblyman Marc Berman, D-Palo Alto, who authored the bill, said he was moved during five informational hearings throughout the state during the 2017-2018 legislative session, when students shared their stories of homelessness and housing insecurities that prevented them from completing their degrees.

The bill passed by a 10-0 vote out of the Assembly Higher Education Committee on Tuesday and it will next go to the Assembly Appropriations Committee in mid-May, according to Berman.

“When we surveyed homeless college liaisons, they said that housing is the greatest need of the students they serve and yet the hardest need to meet,” Shahera Hyatt, director of the California Homeless Youth Project, said during a press conference at the state Capitol in Sacramento on Tuesday.

The California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office and The Hope Center’s #RealCollege initiative surveyed nearly 40,000 students at 57 community colleges statewide.

Of those respondents, 19 percent said they experienced homelessness in the last 12 months and 20 percent said they experienced having to sleep in their cars.

Extrapolate that to California’s community college population of 2.1 million students, and it means that almost 400,000 students statewide have experienced homelessness in the last year.

“Four hundred thousand homeless community college students in California is totally unacceptable,” Berman said.

The assemblyman said he wants to tackle this issue head-on with feasible short-term solutions that have never been done before, such as AB 302.

“This is the answer, not the problem,” Berman said. “It’s not like these kids don’t exist, and we need to stop pretending like they don’t exist. We need to start helping them.”

Students also addressed how these basic need insecurities are not just getting in the way of their education, but creating concerns for their overall safety.

“I was working full time and I was going to school in the evenings and after I left class each night, the biggest challenge for me was where am I going to go?” said Anthony White, a second-year Palomar College student and veteran of the U.S. Marines.

White said he lived in his truck for eight months while being a full-time dad, but decided to send his son to live with his mom out of state because his housing situation was not stable enough.

“These students are sleeping in their cars, in our communities, tonight. It’s happening,” Berman said. “Rather than the student sleeping in a residential neighborhood in Palo Alto, the student will be able to sleep in their cars on campus at Foothill or De Anza community college.”

Matthew Bodo, a third-year student at Foothill College in Los Altos Hills, also experienced homelessness for about two years off and on. He primarily slept in his car while couch surfing and trying to find a stable place to live.

Bodo said he was a full-time student at the time he was homeless and worked a full-time job, but was still unable to afford rent. He then tried to sleep at the parking facilities on Foothill College’s campus, but was met with police resistance.

“I did attempt to sleep in my car on campus and was asked to leave several times by campus police,” said Bodo. “So I resorted to sleeping nearby off campus, which was not well received by the residents of the area.”

Bodo said residents vandalized his car, which also served as his home and the damage made more of an impact because of that.

“I ended up parking farther and farther away from campus to try and find somewhere legal and safe, which was problematic because everyday before starting my day at work or school, I would travel to campus to use the showers that were available to all students,” he said.

The showers and other facilities Bodo accessed were recently made available to students through another bill already passed, AB 1995.

The wording of AB 302 is still vague because Berman said he wants as much flexibility for individual colleges’ governing boards to come up with their own plans, including figuring out how to identify these students, quiet hours and security concerning local police.

Berman said he knows he is asking a lot already from community colleges, but assures he is asking the same for everyone.

“We as a society have failed miserably, we have failed to build the amount of housing necessary to house our students, to house our retirees, to house our workers,” Berman said.

“And because we as a society have failed miserably over the last few decades, we now have to look for creative solutions to address the repercussions of our failures.”

  • 17777_original
  • 17778_original
  • 17779_original
  • 17780_original

Most Popular

Christian Trujano is a staff reporter for Embarcadero Media's East Bay Division, the Pleasanton Weekly. He returned to the company in May 2022 after having interned for the Palo Alto Weekly in 2019. Christian...

Join the Conversation

No comments

  1. Seems to me Marc Berman just solved the RV issue in MV and Palo Alto. Send everyone up to Foothill or any state funded educational institution. Foothill has their own security for safety purposes. CHP is there too. Plenty of room for an extra parking lot if needed. Already supported by our tax dollars. It’s a beautiful campus with available transportation, mental health and job services. Foothill and LAH can partner with a campground company to provide hookups. Folks in their cars and RV’s just need to sign up for school. Getting an education would be the only requirement necessary for free overnight parking. Great idea. Get an education and free parking. Clearly a win/win. Kudos to Marc. And best of all, it’s free to the subscriber.

  2. It only passed through committee. Doubtful it will become law. If it does, then two years later a similar law needs to be passed for four-year degree granting UC and Cal State. Otherwise, what’s the real value of an AA degree anyway? In four years we could then approve MA/MS students and in 6 years doctoral students at UC. And just think if Bernie wins in 2020. A college education will be free and the parking lots packed day and night!

    Feel the Burn!

  3. “Why not let them park on grade school campuses instead??? The parents would just LOVE that.”

    Surprised the parents don’t object to you camping out there right now…

  4. Thank you for proposing a short-term solution to help ensure safety for people trying to better their position in life by attending school. It is a sad reality that affordable housing can be out of reach for some students, and kudos to Marc Berman for taking action.

  5. Are the parking lots even big enough for both “vehicular residents” and day commuters? Don’t even consider this proposal without first figuring out how to pay for toilets, showers, sewer-hookups, and plenty of 24-7 security in the parking lots.

  6. The last quotes from Marc Berman say it all. If there’s nowhere for some our community college students to live, then the least we can do is let them stay overnight in the college’s parking lot.

  7. Let them eat cake. Foothill and DeAnza Colleges already have parking problems without letting the homeless, “park there forever” Winnebego invaders swarm to their campuses after local cities kick them out. If “no overnight parking” is a good idea for cities, then it is an even better idea for the colleges. No one except for support staff are supposed to be at Colleges at night. Also, the Winnebegos present safety, public health, waste disposal, and social/health/mental support problems that colleges don’t want and can’t afford on their campuses. Their function is to educate students, not to become social welfare agencies for the poor. Berman should get a firm grasp on economic and social reality and not live in a fantasy world.

    Why not let them park on grade school campuses instead??? The parents would just LOVE that.

  8. This is a good idea. There are a lot of empty parking lots on campuses at night. Yet, the details will be important. Costs will add up. As said before there are costs of toilets, showers, sewer-hookups, and security in the parking lots. Plus the costs of permitting and enforcement.
    A minimum 8 hours of Dark and Quiet should required, both for the campers and surrounding neighborhoods. The free(?) camping should expire, and the parking lots vacated, at the end of every term.
    Every campus should be given two years to run trail periods with a small set (50?) of campers before they are required to open it up to larger crowds.
    This won’t be simple.

Leave a comment