Vaping ordinance and youth mental health are now top goals for Mountain View City Council | News | Mountain View Online |

News

Vaping ordinance and youth mental health are now top goals for Mountain View City Council

Pod cars and other transportation initiatives moved to the back of the line of staff priorities

Faced with too many ambitious plans and not nearly enough staff time, the Mountain View City Council took a scalpel to its long list of big-ticket priorities Tuesday night.

Transportation initiatives were largely the losers, while a bid for a citywide vaping ban and improvements to youth mental health won coveted spots in the lengthy catalog of council goals.

The Feb. 4 meeting marked a major check-in for the council's biennial goal-setting process, which sets a road map for addressing the city's most pressing issues. It also gives council members a broadly defined forum to spitball ideas, rapidly taking on a bevy of disparate topics in a small theater inside the Mountain View Center for Performing Arts. Council members "voted" by placing colored stickers on easel pads next to favored items.

Gaining the sticker of approval from all seven council members was a new plan to help address gaps in youth mental health care in Mountain View. The idea, put forth by Mayor Margaret Abe-Koga last year, would have the city bring together school districts, nonprofits and county health officials to figure out what services are lacking and what can be done about it. It could also usher in a boost of funding from the city to mental health providers.

Abe-Koga said she believes the city could become an important "conduit" between health care agencies and local schools. The idea comes after the deaths of two high school students by suicide since August 2018.

The council was cautious, however, of overstepping boundaries, and agreed that the work should be done primarily by council members themselves through the Youth Services Committee. Councilwoman Lisa Matichak said the city doesn't have the expertise to champion mental health initiatives that have long been the purview of Santa Clara County and local nonprofits, and worried it would take up too much staff time.

"I would prefer the city not take the lead, given how much we have on our plate," she said.

Also getting added to the priority list is an ordinance restricting the sale of electronic cigarettes and vaping products within city limits, which could come back to the council for a vote in June. The decision follows recent calls by county officials and local school districts urging the city to do more to curb a troubling rise in teen vaping.

Mountain View does not have an ordinance restricting the sale of tobacco products near schools and in pharmacies, and does not prohibit the sale of flavored tobacco products that appeal to teens. A study last February found a reduction in tobacco use among youth and young adults in areas that adopted robust compliance checks and enforcement programs to monitor illicit sales to minors.

Though the Tuesday meeting was a chance to add new priorities, the bulk of the discussion was spent trying to find a middle ground with city staffers seeking to postpone time-consuming tasks or items that require new hires. A study originally slated to begin this month on an automated transit system into North Bayshore got bumped to November, pending the hiring of a new assistant public works director. The launch of the city's new electric scooter program got postponed from June until some time in the fall, again because of vacant transportation staff positions.

Council members were less willing to relent on housing goals that staff sought to delay. Councilwoman Ellen Kamei balked at the idea of pushing back plans to support middle-income housing strategies by eight months, and prevailed in getting a lean version of the plan to move forward next month. Families making between 80% and 120% of the area's median income -- currently set at $131,400 -- are in the uncomfortable spot of making too much to qualify for subsidized housing but not enough to afford market-rate housing, and city officials have sought to bridge the gap for the so-called "missing middle."

Kamei asked city staff to come back with options for a down payment assistance program and other ways to help families make the leap to homeownership.

"It's really a large jump, and as a community that is 25% working young professionals, I think we as a city really need to show a pathway for middle-income families to stay in our community," she said.

Councilman Lucas Ramirez pushed back on a delay in changing the city's tenant relocation assistance package, which is part of the council's plan to curb tenant displacement following a series of redevelopment projects that tore down older, more affordable apartments. The council is expected to revisit its relocation assistance ordinance in the spring, including plans to lower the income threshold for eligibility and circumstances in which displaced tenants could receive an additional $5,000.

Discarded goals at the meeting included an ordinance that would have required the safe storing of firearms in homes and vehicles, which received only three stickers, as well as a bid by Abe-Koga to prohibit smoking in apartment complexes and other multi-unit residences.

What is democracy worth to you?
Support local journalism.

Comments

14 people like this
Posted by USA
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Feb 7, 2020 at 1:33 pm

How about working on the basics of running the city such as street repairs, park maintenance, police patrols, etc?


3 people like this
Posted by PeaceLove
a resident of Shoreline West
on Feb 8, 2020 at 6:21 pm

>Also getting added to the priority list is an ordinance restricting the sale of electronic cigarettes and vaping products >within city limits, which could come back to the council for a vote in June.

Authoritarian much?

Considering:
1. Cigarettes are still legal and sold literally everywhere, including throughout Mountain View
2. Cigarettes are responsible for around 400,000 American deaths each year
Therefore: Banning electronic cigarettes and other vaping products -- but not cigarettes themselves -- is illogical and self-evidently stupid if your goal is to prevent needless deaths above all other priorities.

Considering:
1. Adults in the U.S. are generally free to use tobacco in Mountain View and elsewhere
2 Cigarettes cause enormous suffering and death *even when used as directed*
Therefore: The City Council is acting in an authoritarian manner by moving to ban one particular, and much less dangerous -- delivery system for nicotine such that adults will have to travel out of the city to stock up.

Besides being authoritarian, this law would disproportionately target low-income adults and others who may lack a convenient way to drive to the next town over to get their vaping fix.

>A study last February found a reduction in tobacco use among youth and young adults in areas that adopted robust >compliance checks and enforcement programs to monitor illicit sales to minors.

Hilarious. This sentence literally undermines the previous one by citing a study about "robust compliance checks and enforcement programs," NOT a sales ban. Is this just very sloppy editing or is the Voice's bias showing?


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields


Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Umami Burger calls it quits in downtown Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 15 comments | 9,267 views

Couples and Premarital : "Who we are . . . depends in part . . . on who we love."
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 2,630 views

Flying: How much is enough? It's personal.
By Sherry Listgarten | 9 comments | 2,170 views

Wait, wait – we’re working on it
By Diana Diamond | 10 comments | 1,412 views

My Pet Peeves
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 7 comments | 1,227 views

 

Short story writers wanted!

The 34th Annual Palo Alto Weekly Short Story Contest is now accepting entries for Adult, Young Adult and Teen categories. Send us your short story (2,500 words or less) and entry form by March 27, 2020. First, Second and Third Place prizes awarded in each category.

View Details