News

Mountain View autonomous flight company files lawsuit, claims competitor stole its design

Mountain View-based Wisk is suing a competitor claiming theft of its design. Courtesy Wisk.

A legal battle is brewing between two local companies vying to create flying autonomous air-taxis, with one alleging that the other poached employees, stole trade secrets and copied its aircraft design.

Mountain View-based Wisk Aero LLC filed the suit Tuesday claiming that a similar company next door, Palo Alto-based Archer Aviation, had hired former employees who surreptitiously downloaded thousands of documents laying out Wisk's research, design, testing and fabrication of its aircraft.

Both companies are in an increasingly competitive race to create all-electric, self-flying vehicles capable of ferrying customers over traffic. The industry is seeking to make flights commercially available through designated landing pads, from which the vehicles can vertically lift off.

But where it took Wisk close to eight years before announcing its flagship aircraft, Archer was able to catch up in the span of a year.

Wisk alleges that Archer could not have progressed that quickly with only a fraction of the employees of other competitors, and claims that Archer's aircraft design was alarmingly similar to the Wisk's own patented design. Both have six front rotors, each with five blades that can be tilted horizontally and vertically, along with six rear rotors and an "unconventional" V-shaped tail.

What's local journalism worth to you?

Support Mountain View Online for as little as $5/month.

Join

"The striking similarity in these designs could not have been a coincidence," Wisk said in a statement Tuesday.

Wisk alleges a competitor, Archer, copied its design for an autonomous aircraft. Image courtesy Wisk.

A spokesperson from Archer said the company intends to defend itself "vigorously" against the allegations, and that the company itself looked into the claims that former Wisk employees had swiped trade secrets and determined the concerns were unfounded.

"It's regrettable that Wisk would engage in litigation in an attempt to deflect from the business issues that have caused several of its employees to depart," the Archer spokesperson said in a statement. "The plaintiff raised these matters over a year ago, and after looking into them thoroughly, we have no reason to believe any proprietary Wisk technology ever made its way to Archer."

Wisk's lawsuit paints a picture in which Archer, a new entrant in the urban air mobility industry, had "raided" the workforces of more experienced competitors through targeted recruitment, hiring away 10 of Wisk's engineers in the span of eight days early last year. The civil complaint, filed in the Northern District of California, describes how Archer co-founders Brett Adcock and Adam Goldstein had no prior background in engineering or aviation, and did not appear to have an office location or employees as of December 2019.

Concerned with the exodus of employees, Wisk conducted a forensic investigation and found one of the exiting employees had allegedly downloaded thousands of sensitive files around midnight, shortly before his departure from the company. Another engineer downloaded "numerous" files containing test data, and a third had wiped his computer activity before leaving, the company said.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Sign up for free

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Sign up for free

"Wisk immediately took steps to demand the return of its proprietary and trade secret information," the company said in the lawsuit. "The former Wisk employees, however, claimed ignorance, denied possessing such information, or suggested that such information had been subsequently destroyed."

Things came to a head in February, when Archer released investor materials that included photos and a technical description of its proposed aircraft. Wisk said the design has such a striking similarity that it revealed the "full scope of intellectual property theft" that the company feared. Wisk is seeking a jury trial claiming misappropriation of trade secrets and multiple instances of patent infringement.

To bolster its claims of theft, Wisk notes that the company has numerous competitors -- including Joby, Lilium, Volocopter, and eHang -- that have each ended up with their own unique aircraft designs, with diverse shapes, sizes, wings and rotors. Archer stands out in stark contrast, Wisk said in the lawsuit, by closely mirroring an existing design in the industry.

Wisk's lawsuit claims established companies developing autonomous flying vehicles have diverse designs, in contrast to Archer. Image courtesy Wisk.

And while many of these competitors have spent years developing the tech with teams of hundreds of engineers, Archer reportedly had a team of about 35 engineers -- half of whom come from Wisk, according to the complaint.

"Archer's competitors ... typically have spent ten years or more to develop an aircraft to certify, which will be followed by a years-long certification process," according to the lawsuit. "But Archer inexplicably claims it has the ability to design, manufacture, and certify an aircraft by 2024 -- despite not even having any facilities as of December 2019."

In previous interviews, Wisk representatives said the company and the industry at large are still a ways off from providing commercially available flights to the public. There are few places that the autonomous aircrafts would be able to lift off and land, and limits on battery life constrain how far the aircraft can shuttle customers.

Craving a new voice in Peninsula dining?

Sign up for the Peninsula Foodist newsletter.

Sign up now

Follow Mountain View Voice Online on Twitter @mvvoice, Facebook and on Instagram @mvvoice for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Mountain View autonomous flight company files lawsuit, claims competitor stole its design

by / Mountain View Voice

Uploaded: Fri, Apr 9, 2021, 12:28 pm

A legal battle is brewing between two local companies vying to create flying autonomous air-taxis, with one alleging that the other poached employees, stole trade secrets and copied its aircraft design.

Mountain View-based Wisk Aero LLC filed the suit Tuesday claiming that a similar company next door, Palo Alto-based Archer Aviation, had hired former employees who surreptitiously downloaded thousands of documents laying out Wisk's research, design, testing and fabrication of its aircraft.

Both companies are in an increasingly competitive race to create all-electric, self-flying vehicles capable of ferrying customers over traffic. The industry is seeking to make flights commercially available through designated landing pads, from which the vehicles can vertically lift off.

But where it took Wisk close to eight years before announcing its flagship aircraft, Archer was able to catch up in the span of a year.

Wisk alleges that Archer could not have progressed that quickly with only a fraction of the employees of other competitors, and claims that Archer's aircraft design was alarmingly similar to the Wisk's own patented design. Both have six front rotors, each with five blades that can be tilted horizontally and vertically, along with six rear rotors and an "unconventional" V-shaped tail.

"The striking similarity in these designs could not have been a coincidence," Wisk said in a statement Tuesday.

A spokesperson from Archer said the company intends to defend itself "vigorously" against the allegations, and that the company itself looked into the claims that former Wisk employees had swiped trade secrets and determined the concerns were unfounded.

"It's regrettable that Wisk would engage in litigation in an attempt to deflect from the business issues that have caused several of its employees to depart," the Archer spokesperson said in a statement. "The plaintiff raised these matters over a year ago, and after looking into them thoroughly, we have no reason to believe any proprietary Wisk technology ever made its way to Archer."

Wisk's lawsuit paints a picture in which Archer, a new entrant in the urban air mobility industry, had "raided" the workforces of more experienced competitors through targeted recruitment, hiring away 10 of Wisk's engineers in the span of eight days early last year. The civil complaint, filed in the Northern District of California, describes how Archer co-founders Brett Adcock and Adam Goldstein had no prior background in engineering or aviation, and did not appear to have an office location or employees as of December 2019.

Concerned with the exodus of employees, Wisk conducted a forensic investigation and found one of the exiting employees had allegedly downloaded thousands of sensitive files around midnight, shortly before his departure from the company. Another engineer downloaded "numerous" files containing test data, and a third had wiped his computer activity before leaving, the company said.

"Wisk immediately took steps to demand the return of its proprietary and trade secret information," the company said in the lawsuit. "The former Wisk employees, however, claimed ignorance, denied possessing such information, or suggested that such information had been subsequently destroyed."

Things came to a head in February, when Archer released investor materials that included photos and a technical description of its proposed aircraft. Wisk said the design has such a striking similarity that it revealed the "full scope of intellectual property theft" that the company feared. Wisk is seeking a jury trial claiming misappropriation of trade secrets and multiple instances of patent infringement.

To bolster its claims of theft, Wisk notes that the company has numerous competitors -- including Joby, Lilium, Volocopter, and eHang -- that have each ended up with their own unique aircraft designs, with diverse shapes, sizes, wings and rotors. Archer stands out in stark contrast, Wisk said in the lawsuit, by closely mirroring an existing design in the industry.

And while many of these competitors have spent years developing the tech with teams of hundreds of engineers, Archer reportedly had a team of about 35 engineers -- half of whom come from Wisk, according to the complaint.

"Archer's competitors ... typically have spent ten years or more to develop an aircraft to certify, which will be followed by a years-long certification process," according to the lawsuit. "But Archer inexplicably claims it has the ability to design, manufacture, and certify an aircraft by 2024 -- despite not even having any facilities as of December 2019."

In previous interviews, Wisk representatives said the company and the industry at large are still a ways off from providing commercially available flights to the public. There are few places that the autonomous aircrafts would be able to lift off and land, and limits on battery life constrain how far the aircraft can shuttle customers.

Comments

Kal Sandhu
Registered user
Castro City
on Apr 9, 2021 at 2:21 pm
Kal Sandhu, Castro City
Registered user
on Apr 9, 2021 at 2:21 pm

Aaah!!
Seems like the days of the robber barons, Silicon Valley-style, are back.


kehlar
Registered user
another community
on Apr 9, 2021 at 7:57 pm
kehlar, another community
Registered user
on Apr 9, 2021 at 7:57 pm

Two words: Anthony Levandowski


mimo
Registered user
Cuesta Park
on Apr 10, 2021 at 9:23 am
mimo, Cuesta Park
Registered user
on Apr 10, 2021 at 9:23 am

"flying AUTONOMOUS air-taxis"? Are there people who would adventure using these?


catrov
Registered user
North Bayshore
on Apr 11, 2021 at 11:08 am
catrov, North Bayshore
Registered user
on Apr 11, 2021 at 11:08 am

The safety of autonomous air taxis has been questioned. While no mode of transportation is completely safe, here are a few ways in which an autonomous air vehicle has a much easier task than a ground vehicle:
1) No pedestrians, objects in the roadway, construction barricades, etc to detect and avoid.
2) No constantly shifting lane markings to detect and follow.
3) No constant stop signs/stop lights to detect and obey, with severe bad results for failure.
4) Only other air traffic needs detecting and that could be managed by new protocols built in from the beginning of autonomous air taxi operations.
5) Air traffic is not stop-and-go.

Not having to concentrate moment-by-moment on staying separated from, and not colliding with, other vehicles mere feet away makes air navigation much easier and safer to automate than its road counterpart. Not having to deal with legacy users (e.g. pedestrians, who must still remain free to cross the street without coordinating with a computerized traffic system) plus stop lights, lane shifts and drivers who brake suddenly means that most of the really hard part of what autonomous ground vehicles have to do is not required in the air.

TL;DR - Autonomous air vehicles have a much easier job to do, thus they are inherently safer than autonomous ground vehicles.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.