News

Mountain View City Council approves $165M early design for future public safety building

An early rendering design of a future public safety building in Mountain View. Courtesy city of Mountain View.

The Mountain View City Council voted Tuesday night to approve early design plans for the city’s new public safety building, an expensive project that's expected to cost between $160 and $165 million and may need a ballot measure to get over the finish line.

City officials have long sought to renovate or replace the public safety building at 1000 Villa Street. The building that houses the city’s police department operations, fire department administrative staff, emergency dispatch (the 911 call center) and emergency operations center, was built over 40 years ago and does not meet current seismic standards.

The existing building design has been problematic for years, with an inflexible structure and plenty of leaks, glare and heat problems.

Further faults in the aging building became even more apparent during the intense rainy season this past winter. At the city’s annual update held on March 31, City Manager Kimbra McCarthy said the facility’s basement floor flooded several times, which put the city’s 911 call center and emergency operations center at risk.

“It has been apparent for many, many years that the city needs to build a new public safety building,” McCarthy said at the annual update.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

How the city plans to fund the new building is still up in the air, though there have been talks to implement a tax revenue measure on the November 2024 ballot to cover a large portion of the cost.

Though the plans won approval at the June 27 meeting, there were some concerns related to the building’s design – including vehicle access and room for growth – which will be doctored up in the final design concept and anticipated to be reviewed by council in early 2024.

The city estimates that the project will begin construction in March 2025 and be completed in late 2027.

The city has been in talks to overhaul the current facility for two decades now, but construction costs have risen dramatically over time. When the city looked at pursuing a similar design in 2014, city officials said construction would cost $65 million. In 2021, that number jumped to $134 million. Now, the bill is looking to be upward of $160 million.

The approved conceptual design involves constructing a three-story, approximately 68,000-square-foot building – 51% larger than the current facility – and a 2.5-story parking garage with nearly 100 additional parking spots.

Courtesy city of Mountain View.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

This plan to expand the size of the facility was based on studies from 2002 and 2010, both of which concluded the existing facility required “significant seismic retrofit work and expansion.”

At the Tuesday meeting, council members asked Public Works staff to further study how many police and fire department personnel will be needed over the next 50 or so years to ensure that the building can accommodate any growth. Prior studies only looked at staffing needs through 2030.

“Who knows when we will have the opportunity to redo this building? Certainly not in my lifetime,” Council member Lisa Matichak said. “Let's make sure we're really planning for the future here and not be penny wise and pound foolish.”

Council members voiced concerns about the design not having an alternative exit to the parking garage in case of emergency. Representatives from both the fire and police departments agreed it would be a valuable addition.

Council members also debated the architectural aesthetic of the building. Matichak said the conceptual design looked too much like an “office,” rather than a city building with “permanence” and “gravitas,” like City Hall or the library, for instance.

“Let’s take a look at some other alternatives for the architecture,” Matichak said.

Regardless of the architectural choices set to be made, all council members appeared to agree on the project’s time sensitivity, particularly with rising construction costs and the building remaining seismically unsound.

“I feel an immediate sense of urgency in doing something as soon as possible,” Council member Ellen Kamei said.

Craving a new voice in Peninsula dining?

Sign up for the Peninsula Foodist newsletter.

Sign up now

Follow Mountain View Voice Online on Twitter @mvvoice, Facebook and on Instagram @mvvoice for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Get uninterrupted access to important local law enforcement news. Become a member today.

Mountain View City Council approves $165M early design for future public safety building

by Samantha Stevens / Mountain View Voice

Uploaded: Wed, Jun 28, 2023, 2:52 pm

The Mountain View City Council voted Tuesday night to approve early design plans for the city’s new public safety building, an expensive project that's expected to cost between $160 and $165 million and may need a ballot measure to get over the finish line.

City officials have long sought to renovate or replace the public safety building at 1000 Villa Street. The building that houses the city’s police department operations, fire department administrative staff, emergency dispatch (the 911 call center) and emergency operations center, was built over 40 years ago and does not meet current seismic standards.

The existing building design has been problematic for years, with an inflexible structure and plenty of leaks, glare and heat problems.

Further faults in the aging building became even more apparent during the intense rainy season this past winter. At the city’s annual update held on March 31, City Manager Kimbra McCarthy said the facility’s basement floor flooded several times, which put the city’s 911 call center and emergency operations center at risk.

“It has been apparent for many, many years that the city needs to build a new public safety building,” McCarthy said at the annual update.

How the city plans to fund the new building is still up in the air, though there have been talks to implement a tax revenue measure on the November 2024 ballot to cover a large portion of the cost.

Though the plans won approval at the June 27 meeting, there were some concerns related to the building’s design – including vehicle access and room for growth – which will be doctored up in the final design concept and anticipated to be reviewed by council in early 2024.

The city estimates that the project will begin construction in March 2025 and be completed in late 2027.

The city has been in talks to overhaul the current facility for two decades now, but construction costs have risen dramatically over time. When the city looked at pursuing a similar design in 2014, city officials said construction would cost $65 million. In 2021, that number jumped to $134 million. Now, the bill is looking to be upward of $160 million.

The approved conceptual design involves constructing a three-story, approximately 68,000-square-foot building – 51% larger than the current facility – and a 2.5-story parking garage with nearly 100 additional parking spots.

This plan to expand the size of the facility was based on studies from 2002 and 2010, both of which concluded the existing facility required “significant seismic retrofit work and expansion.”

At the Tuesday meeting, council members asked Public Works staff to further study how many police and fire department personnel will be needed over the next 50 or so years to ensure that the building can accommodate any growth. Prior studies only looked at staffing needs through 2030.

“Who knows when we will have the opportunity to redo this building? Certainly not in my lifetime,” Council member Lisa Matichak said. “Let's make sure we're really planning for the future here and not be penny wise and pound foolish.”

Council members voiced concerns about the design not having an alternative exit to the parking garage in case of emergency. Representatives from both the fire and police departments agreed it would be a valuable addition.

Council members also debated the architectural aesthetic of the building. Matichak said the conceptual design looked too much like an “office,” rather than a city building with “permanence” and “gravitas,” like City Hall or the library, for instance.

“Let’s take a look at some other alternatives for the architecture,” Matichak said.

Regardless of the architectural choices set to be made, all council members appeared to agree on the project’s time sensitivity, particularly with rising construction costs and the building remaining seismically unsound.

“I feel an immediate sense of urgency in doing something as soon as possible,” Council member Ellen Kamei said.

Comments

Free Speech
Registered user
Martens-Carmelita
on Jun 29, 2023 at 11:15 pm
Free Speech, Martens-Carmelita
Registered user
on Jun 29, 2023 at 11:15 pm

"Permanence" and "gravitas" come with a hefty price tag. The council members can do what they like as long as they don't expect the citizens of a small city, such as Mountain View, to pay for this behemoth - and as long as they don't remove a single heritage tree in the process.


Leslie Bain
Registered user
Cuesta Park
on Jun 30, 2023 at 12:27 pm
Leslie Bain, Cuesta Park
Registered user
on Jun 30, 2023 at 12:27 pm

Remember it was only a few short months ago (Jan 2023) when then Mayor Lucas Ramirez, together with council members Ellen Kamei and Pat Showalter, expressed concerns about cost of a special election to fill the vacancy left by Sally Lieber. Web Link

$2 million was the estimated price tag.

Ramirez said it would be really nice to have “funds for things that the community will actually NEED” (Web Link ~1.35.10), implying that the public's right to choose its political leaders doesn't even register on his radar as an important “need”.

We have since learned that the city is in good financial shape! Web Link

And now the CC has approved $165 million for a new public building, one that they hope has "gravitas"!

We have $165 million for a building, but not $2 million to allow VOTERS to express their will? Seriously?

Shame on Lucas Ramirez, Ellen Kamei, and Pat Showalter. I never thought I’d see such disregard for voting rights in little old Mountain View.

Never forget that by filling the seat themselves, the CC essentially silenced the voice of voters when it came to the new Housing Element. Never forget that the new Housing Element benefits developers, Google, and high-wage earners far more than MOST residents who call MV their home.


SRB
Registered user
St. Francis Acres
on Jul 1, 2023 at 7:51 am
SRB, St. Francis Acres
Registered user
on Jul 1, 2023 at 7:51 am

re: "Council members voiced concerns about the design not having an alternative exit to the parking garage in case of emergency."

That's a problem the City is creating by closing access to Evelyn from the Police station. Access is closed to make way to a very expensive ramp onto the Shoreline overpass. City could solve that emergency access issue and save a ton of money..... by not building that ramp and letting transit center traffic go from Evelyn to Franklin to Villa to Shoreline.


ivg
Registered user
Another Mountain View Neighborhood
on Jul 3, 2023 at 2:01 pm
ivg, Another Mountain View Neighborhood
Registered user
on Jul 3, 2023 at 2:01 pm

That was Lisa Matichak asking for "gravitas". At least she's consistent about wanting to spend more money.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.